CBOL vs. BWOW
CBOL (Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF) and BWOW (Bitwise Dogecoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CBOL is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos, while BWOW is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the DOGE/USD Exchange Rate - Benchmark Price Return. CBOL is actively managed, while BWOW is passively managed. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CBOL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for BWOW.
Performance
CBOL vs. BWOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBOL achieves a -1.78% return, which is significantly higher than BWOW's -39.90% return.
CBOL
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- 6M
- -0.55%
- YTD
- -1.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BWOW
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -5.27%
- 6M
- -35.54%
- YTD
- -39.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.17K | $4.15K | $4.88K | |
| $23.76K | $29.60K | $17.43K |
CBOL vs. BWOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF | -1.78% | 0.07% |
BWOW Bitwise Dogecoin ETF | -39.90% | -22.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBOL and BWOW is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBOL vs. BWOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL) and Bitwise Dogecoin ETF (BWOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBOL vs. BWOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBOL drawdown since its inception was -5.05%, smaller than the maximum BWOW drawdown of -55.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBOL and BWOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBOL | BWOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.05% | -55.66% | +50.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.40% | -54.70% | +50.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.49% | -34.07% | +30.58% |
Volatility
CBOL vs. BWOW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBOL | BWOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.64% | 68.39% | -64.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.64% | 68.39% | -64.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.64% | 68.39% | -64.75% |
CBOL vs. BWOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBOL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BWOW's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBOL vs. BWOW - Dividend Comparison
CBOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, while BWOW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BWOW Bitwise Dogecoin ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF | 1.82% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBOL and BWOW have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BWOW is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BWOW is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CBOL.
CBOL has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.00% for BWOW.
CBOL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BWOW is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for CBOL and 0.34% for BWOW.
Find the right allocation for CBOL and BWOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer