CBOE vs. RYCEY
CBOE (Cboe Global Markets, Inc.) and RYCEY (Rolls-Royce Holdings plc) are both stocks. CBOE operates in Financial Data & Stock Exchanges (Financial Services), while RYCEY operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CBOE returned 17.84%/yr vs 8.49%/yr for RYCEY. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CBOE vs. RYCEY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBOE achieves a 18.03% return, which is significantly higher than RYCEY's 12.43% return. Over the past 10 years, CBOE has outperformed RYCEY with an annualized return of 17.84%, while RYCEY has yielded a comparatively lower 8.49% annualized return.
CBOE
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -19.41%
- YTD
- 18.03%
- 6M
- 17.09%
- 1Y
- 31.68%
- 3Y*
- 31.02%
- 5Y*
- 22.58%
- 10Y*
- 17.84%
RYCEY
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- 7.56%
- YTD
- 12.43%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 46.06%
- 3Y*
- 113.04%
- 5Y*
- 61.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.49%
CBOE vs. RYCEY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 18.03% | 29.96% | 10.74% | 44.37% | -2.16% | 42.23% | -21.17% | 24.16% | -20.60% | 70.49% |
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 12.43% | 123.64% | 88.21% | 253.27% | -33.95% | 2.53% | -82.05% | -12.69% | -7.35% | 40.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBOE and RYCEY is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2014 | 0.07 |
The correlation between CBOE and RYCEY shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CBOE:
$30.97B
RYCEY:
$147.86B
CBOE:
$11.77
RYCEY:
£0.99
CBOE:
25.07
RYCEY:
13.26
CBOE:
0.47
RYCEY:
0.03
CBOE:
6.46
RYCEY:
2.77
CBOE:
5.76
RYCEY:
40.55
CBOE:
$4.79B
RYCEY:
£40.04B
CBOE:
$2.50B
RYCEY:
£10.10B
CBOE:
$1.87B
RYCEY:
£8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBOE vs. RYCEY — Risk / Return Rank
CBOE
RYCEY
CBOE vs. RYCEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBOE | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.23 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 2.13 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.70 | 5.98 | -0.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBOE vs. RYCEY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBOE drawdown since its inception was -43.23%, smaller than the maximum RYCEY drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBOE and RYCEY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBOE | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.23% | -99.07% | +55.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.69% | -21.75% | -2.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.69% | -23.37% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.69% | -62.01% | +37.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.23% | -94.64% | +51.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.41% | -77.68% | +58.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.41% | -84.15% | +72.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.58% | 7.73% | -2.15% |
Volatility
CBOE vs. RYCEY - Volatility Comparison
Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE) has a higher volatility of 15.70% compared to Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) at 12.00%. This indicates that CBOE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYCEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBOE | RYCEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.70% | 12.00% | +3.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.24% | 32.70% | -8.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.44% | 37.88% | -10.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.27% | 43.48% | -20.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.36% | 49.35% | -23.99% |
Dividends
CBOE vs. RYCEY - Dividend Comparison
CBOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than RYCEY's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 0.98% | 1.08% | 1.21% | 1.18% | 1.56% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.12% | 1.19% | 0.83% | 1.30% | 1.36% |
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 0.72% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.51% | 1.56% | 1.32% | 1.55% | 4.19% | 14.44% |
Financials
CBOE vs. RYCEY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cboe Global Markets, Inc. and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CBOE vs. RYCEY - Profitability Comparison
CBOE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported a gross profit of 669.90M and revenue of 1.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.6%.
RYCEY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 11.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
CBOE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported an operating income of 505.60M and revenue of 1.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.7%.
RYCEY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
CBOE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. reported a net income of 385.70M and revenue of 1.27B, resulting in a net margin of 30.3%.
RYCEY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a net income of 1.42B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBOE and RYCEY have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CBOE has higher volatility (15.70%) compared to RYCEY (12.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBOE dropped -43.23% vs RYCEY's -99.07%.
RYCEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CBOE and RYCEY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer