CBOA vs. JULB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CBOA (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - April) and JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. CBOA is passively managed, while JULB is actively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CBOA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JULB.

Performance

CBOA vs. JULB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBOA) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBOA achieves a -6.06% return, which is significantly lower than JULB's 6.35% return.

CBOA

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -1.65%
• YTD: -6.06%
• 6M: -6.36%
• 1Y: -4.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JULB

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 2.40%
• YTD: 6.35%
• 6M: 6.93%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBOA vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CBOA Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - April	-6.06%	-1.16%
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF	6.35%	2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between CBOA and JULB is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025	0.50

Return for Risk

CBOA vs. JULB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBOA

CBOA Risk / Return Rank: 3
CBOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CBOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CBOA Omega Ratio Rank: 2
CBOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
CBOA Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBOA vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBOA) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CBOA	JULB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.89	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.13	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.61	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.18	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CBOA	JULB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.89	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.19	2.17	-2.36

Drawdowns

CBOA vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBOA drawdown since its inception was -7.91%, which is greater than JULB's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBOA and JULB.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBOA	JULB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.91%	-5.24%	-2.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.91%	-0.07%	-7.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.38%	-0.87%	-1.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.06%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CBOA	JULB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.91%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.67%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.39%	6.81%	-1.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.14%	6.81%	-1.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.14%	6.81%	-1.67%

CBOA vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBOA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

CBOA vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison

CBOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, while JULB has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CBOA Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - April	2.38%	2.24%
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBOA and JULB in my portfolio?

CBOA and JULB have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CBOA or JULB?

On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CBOA or JULB?

JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBOA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CBOA or JULB?

CBOA has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 0.00% for JULB.

What is the main difference between CBOA and JULB?

They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBOA and 0.25% for JULB.