CBOA vs. CVRT

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

CBOA (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - April) and CVRT (Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CBOA is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the CBOE Bitcoin US ETF Index, while CVRT is a Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Calamos. CBOA is passively managed, while CVRT is actively managed. Over the past year, CBOA returned -6.50% vs 43.26% for CVRT. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.69% expense ratio.

Performance

CBOA vs. CVRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBOA) and Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBOA achieves a -6.06% return, which is significantly lower than CVRT's 24.60% return.

CBOA

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -0.02%
• 6M: -7.67%
• YTD: -6.06%
• 1Y: -6.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CVRT

• 1D: -2.86%
• 1M: -9.74%
• 6M: 16.71%
• YTD: 24.60%
• 1Y: 43.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBOA vs. CVRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CBOA Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - April	-6.06%	5.22%
CVRT Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF	24.60%	46.11%

Correlation

The correlation between CBOA and CVRT is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025	0.43

Return for Risk

CBOA vs. CVRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBOA

CBOA Risk / Return Rank: 2
CBOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
CBOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CBOA Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CBOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CBOA Martin Ratio Rank: 2

CVRT

CVRT Risk / Return Rank: 74
CVRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CVRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
CVRT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
CVRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
CVRT Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBOA vs. CVRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBOA) and Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CBOA	CVRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.19	1.86	-3.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.53	2.45	-3.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	1.32	-0.52
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.73	3.44	-4.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.32	13.46	-14.78

CBOA vs. CVRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBOA Sharpe Ratio is -1.19, which is lower than the CVRT Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBOA and CVRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CBOA vs. CVRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBOA drawdown since its inception was -8.92%, smaller than the maximum CVRT drawdown of -20.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBOA and CVRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBOA	CVRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.92%	-20.71%	+11.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.92%	-12.63%	+3.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.91%	-12.63%	+4.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.90%	-3.20%	+0.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.93%	3.22%	+1.71%

Volatility

CBOA vs. CVRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBOA) is 1.16%, while Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that CBOA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBOA	CVRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.16%	6.52%	-5.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.45%	19.20%	-14.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.47%	23.38%	-17.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.07%	20.41%	-15.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.07%	20.41%	-15.34%

CBOA vs. CVRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CBOA and CVRT have an expense ratio of 0.69%.

Dividends

CBOA vs. CVRT - Dividend Comparison

CBOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than CVRT's 1.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CBOA Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - April	2.38%	2.24%	0.00%	0.00%
CVRT Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF	1.59%	1.68%	1.49%	0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBOA and CVRT in my portfolio?

CBOA and CVRT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CBOA or CVRT?

CVRT has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to CBOA (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBOA dropped -8.92% vs CVRT's -20.71%.

Which ETF is better, CBOA or CVRT?

On 1-year performance, CVRT leads with 43.26% vs -6.50% for CBOA. Both ETFs have the same 0.69% expense ratio. On volatility, CBOA has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CBOA or CVRT?

Over the 1-year period, CVRT has performed better with a 43.26% return vs -6.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CBOA or CVRT?

CBOA and CVRT have the same expense ratio: 0.69% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CBOA or CVRT?

CBOA has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 1.59% for CVRT.

What is the main difference between CBOA and CVRT?

CBOA is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CVRT is Convertible Bonds.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CVRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.