CBLS vs. LSEQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CBLS (Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF) and LSEQ (Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CBLS returned 17.91% vs 29.70% for LSEQ. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBLS charges 1.95%/yr vs 1.70%/yr for LSEQ.

Performance

CBLS vs. LSEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS) and Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBLS achieves a 20.31% return, which is significantly lower than LSEQ's 28.71% return.

CBLS

• 1D: -2.34%
• 1M: 2.02%
• YTD: 20.31%
• 6M: 19.29%
• 1Y: 17.91%
• 3Y*: 19.64%
• 5Y*: 5.22%
• 10Y*: —

LSEQ

• 1D: -1.44%
• 1M: 4.89%
• YTD: 28.71%
• 6M: 26.95%
• 1Y: 29.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBLS vs. LSEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CBLS Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF	20.31%	5.87%	28.74%	2.99%
LSEQ Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF	28.71%	4.13%	12.80%	-1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between CBLS and LSEQ is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2023	0.44

The correlation between CBLS and LSEQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CBLS vs. LSEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBLS

CBLS Risk / Return Rank: 35
CBLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
CBLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
CBLS Omega Ratio Rank: 31
CBLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
CBLS Martin Ratio Rank: 36

LSEQ

LSEQ Risk / Return Rank: 69
LSEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
LSEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
LSEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 63
LSEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
LSEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBLS vs. LSEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS) and Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CBLS	LSEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	1.93	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	2.66	-1.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.35	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	4.03	-1.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.20	12.66	-7.46

CBLS vs. LSEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the LSEQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBLS and LSEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CBLS vs. LSEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBLS drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, which is greater than LSEQ's maximum drawdown of -8.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBLS and LSEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBLS	LSEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.78%	-8.35%	-24.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.15%	-7.40%	-0.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.50%	-1.44%	-2.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.70%	-3.19%	-9.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.45%	2.35%	+1.10%

Volatility

CBLS vs. LSEQ - Volatility Comparison

Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS) has a higher volatility of 8.05% compared to Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ) at 5.46%. This indicates that CBLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBLS	LSEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.05%	5.46%	+2.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.81%	13.34%	+0.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.56%	15.50%	+1.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.86%	14.46%	+1.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.28%	14.46%	+1.82%

CBLS vs. LSEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBLS has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than LSEQ's 1.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

CBLS vs. LSEQ - Dividend Comparison

CBLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than LSEQ's 1.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CBLS Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF	0.75%	0.90%	0.73%	0.44%
LSEQ Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF	1.71%	2.20%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBLS and LSEQ in my portfolio?

CBLS and LSEQ have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CBLS or LSEQ?

CBLS has higher volatility (8.05%) compared to LSEQ (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBLS dropped -32.78% vs LSEQ's -8.35%.

Which ETF is better, CBLS or LSEQ?

On 1-year performance, LSEQ leads with 29.70% vs 17.91% for CBLS. On fees, LSEQ is cheaper at 1.70% per year. On volatility, LSEQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CBLS or LSEQ?

Over the 1-year period, LSEQ has performed better with a 29.70% return vs 17.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CBLS or LSEQ?

LSEQ is cheaper with a 1.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.95% for CBLS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CBLS or LSEQ?

LSEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.75% for CBLS.

What is the main difference between CBLS and LSEQ?

They also come from different issuers: Changebridge Capital LLC and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 1.95% for CBLS and 1.70% for LSEQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LSEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.