CBLS vs. FFLS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CBLS (Clough Hedged Equity ETF) and FFLS (Future Fund Long/Short ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CBLS returned 16.15%/yr vs 8.99%/yr for FFLS. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CBLS charges 1.95%/yr vs 1.75%/yr for FFLS.

Performance

CBLS vs. FFLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clough Hedged Equity ETF (CBLS) and Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBLS achieves a 9.99% return, which is significantly higher than FFLS's -1.36% return.

CBLS

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: -8.11%
• 6M: 0.45%
• YTD: 9.99%
• 1Y: 6.27%
• 3Y*: 16.15%
• 5Y*: 3.87%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.64%

FFLS

• 1D: 2.13%
• 1M: -1.93%
• 6M: -2.39%
• YTD: -1.36%
• 1Y: -3.56%
• 3Y*: 8.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CBLS Clough Hedged Equity ETF	$136.56K	$124.70K	$136.61K
FFLS Future Fund Long/Short ETF	$154.37K	$125.96K	$156.23K

CBLS vs. FFLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CBLS Clough Hedged Equity ETF	9.99%	5.87%	28.74%	4.77%
FFLS Future Fund Long/Short ETF	-1.36%	7.49%	17.71%	0.79%

Correlation

The correlation between CBLS and FFLS is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2023	0.51

The correlation between CBLS and FFLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CBLS vs. FFLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CBLS

CBLS Risk / Return Rank: 17
CBLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
CBLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
CBLS Omega Ratio Rank: 17
CBLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
CBLS Martin Ratio Rank: 20

FFLS

FFLS Risk / Return Rank: 6
FFLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
FFLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
FFLS Omega Ratio Rank: 5
FFLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
FFLS Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CBLS vs. FFLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clough Hedged Equity ETF (CBLS) and Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CBLS	FFLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.29	-0.43	+0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.49	-0.55	+1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	0.94	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.38	-0.41	+0.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.22	-0.79	+2.01

CBLS vs. FFLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBLS Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is higher than the FFLS Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBLS and FFLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CBLS vs. FFLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBLS drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, which is greater than FFLS's maximum drawdown of -11.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBLS and FFLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBLS	FFLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.78%	-11.05%	-21.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.02%	-11.05%	-1.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.27%	-11.05%	-4.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.78%	-6.00%	-5.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.57%	-3.27%	-9.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.10%	5.67%	-1.57%

Volatility

CBLS vs. FFLS - Volatility Comparison

Clough Hedged Equity ETF (CBLS) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS) at 4.13%. This indicates that CBLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBLS	FFLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.32%	4.13%	+1.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.78%	8.76%	+6.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.45%	10.38%	+7.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.92%	11.47%	+4.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.34%	11.47%	+4.87%

CBLS vs. FFLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBLS has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FFLS's 1.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CBLS vs. FFLS - Dividend Comparison

CBLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than FFLS's 6.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CBLS Clough Hedged Equity ETF	0.82%	0.90%	0.73%	0.44%
FFLS Future Fund Long/Short ETF	6.67%	6.58%	3.34%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBLS and FFLS in my portfolio?

CBLS and FFLS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CBLS or FFLS?

CBLS has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to FFLS (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBLS dropped -32.78% vs FFLS's -11.05%.

Which ETF is better, CBLS or FFLS?

On 3-year performance, CBLS leads with 16.15% vs 8.99% for FFLS. On fees, FFLS is cheaper at 1.75% per year. On volatility, FFLS has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CBLS or FFLS?

Over the 3-year period, CBLS has performed better with a 16.15% return vs 8.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CBLS or FFLS?

FFLS is cheaper with a 1.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.95% for CBLS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CBLS or FFLS?

FFLS has the higher dividend yield at 6.67%, compared with 0.82% for CBLS.

What is the main difference between CBLS and FFLS?

They also come from different issuers: Clough and Future Fund. Their fees differ too: 1.95% for CBLS and 1.75% for FFLS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CBLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.29 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.