PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBLS vs. BTAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBLS vs. BTAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS) and AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBLS achieves a 24.17% return, which is significantly higher than BTAL's -20.22% return.


CBLS

1D
3.27%
1M
9.60%
YTD
24.17%
6M
23.40%
1Y
20.95%
3Y*
19.86%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*

BTAL

1D
-1.46%
1M
-7.27%
YTD
-20.22%
6M
-20.85%
1Y
-38.09%
3Y*
-12.84%
5Y*
-4.71%
10Y*
-4.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBLS vs. BTAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CBLS
Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF
24.17%5.87%28.74%-2.67%-11.64%2.85%14.15%
BTAL
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund
-20.22%-20.17%12.83%-15.11%20.48%-6.81%-7.98%

Correlation

The correlation between CBLS and BTAL is -0.59, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2020

-0.54

The correlation between CBLS and BTAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.59 to -0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

CBLS vs. BTAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CBLS
BTAL

Technology

32.3%
19.5%

Energy

10.0%
4.4%

Healthcare

9.2%
10.2%

Utilities

7.5%
5.2%

Basic Materials

7.5%
4.0%

Industrials

3.8%
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

0.4%
12.8%

Communication Services

-2.0%
3.4%

Real Estate

-2.4%
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

-3.8%
5.6%

Financial Services

-6.8%
14.9%

Technology

CBLS
32.3%
BTAL
19.5%

Energy

CBLS
10.0%
BTAL
4.4%

Healthcare

CBLS
9.2%
BTAL
10.2%

Utilities

CBLS
7.5%
BTAL
5.2%

Basic Materials

CBLS
7.5%
BTAL
4.0%

Industrials

CBLS
3.8%
BTAL
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

CBLS
0.4%
BTAL
12.8%

Communication Services

CBLS
-2.0%
BTAL
3.4%

Real Estate

CBLS
-2.4%
BTAL
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

CBLS
-3.8%
BTAL
5.6%

Financial Services

CBLS
-6.8%
BTAL
14.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBLS vs. BTAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBLS
CBLS Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CBLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBLS Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
CBLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

BTAL
BTAL Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
BTAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTAL Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
BTAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTAL Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBLS vs. BTAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS) and AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBLSBTALDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

-1.77

+3.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.94

-2.80

+4.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.71

+0.54

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

-1.02

+3.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.61

-1.76

+8.37

CBLS vs. BTAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the BTAL Sharpe Ratio of -1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBLS and BTAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBLSBTALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

-1.77

+3.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

-0.25

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

-0.24

+0.88

Drawdowns

CBLS vs. BTAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBLS drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, smaller than the maximum BTAL drawdown of -50.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBLS and BTAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBLSBTALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.78%

-50.28%

+17.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.15%

-37.50%

+29.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.27%

-45.16%

+29.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.24%

-45.16%

+13.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-50.28%

+50.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.80%

-21.95%

+9.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

22.09%

-18.75%

Volatility

CBLS vs. BTAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS) is 7.08%, while AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) has a volatility of 7.47%. This indicates that CBLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBLSBTALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.08%

7.47%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.62%

15.35%

-2.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.29%

21.60%

-6.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.64%

18.75%

-3.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.13%

17.24%

-1.11%

CBLS vs. BTAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBLS has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is lower than BTAL's 2.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBLS vs. BTAL - Dividend Comparison

CBLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than BTAL's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BTAL
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund
3.12%2.49%3.49%6.14%1.01%0.00%0.00%0.88%0.39%
CBLS
Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF
0.72%0.90%0.73%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBLS and BTAL have a correlation of -0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTAL has higher volatility (7.47%) compared to CBLS (7.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBLS dropped -32.78% vs BTAL's -50.28%.

On 5-year performance, CBLS leads with 5.73% vs -4.71% for BTAL. On fees, CBLS is cheaper at 1.95% per year. On volatility, CBLS has been the lower-risk option at 7.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, CBLS has performed better with a 5.73% return vs -4.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CBLS is cheaper with a 1.95% expense ratio, compared with 2.11% for BTAL.

BTAL has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 0.72% for CBLS.

They also come from different issuers: Changebridge Capital LLC and AGF. Their fees differ too: 1.95% for CBLS and 2.11% for BTAL.

CBLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBLS and BTAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer