PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBE3.L vs. ICSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBE3.L vs. ICSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares € Govt Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CBE3.L) and iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CBE3.L is traded in EUR, while ICSH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ICSH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBE3.L achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than ICSH's 2.61% return. Over the past 10 years, CBE3.L has underperformed ICSH with an annualized return of 0.36%, while ICSH has yielded a comparatively higher 2.55% annualized return.


CBE3.L

1D
0.04%
1M
0.24%
YTD
0.13%
6M
0.25%
1Y
0.94%
3Y*
2.70%
5Y*
0.81%
10Y*
0.36%

ICSH

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.99%
YTD
2.61%
6M
2.07%
1Y
2.57%
3Y*
2.38%
5Y*
4.64%
10Y*
2.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBE3.L vs. ICSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CBE3.L
iShares € Govt Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.13%2.27%3.11%3.46%-4.26%-0.83%-0.15%0.18%-0.33%0.06%
ICSH
iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
2.61%-7.49%12.49%2.42%7.22%7.65%-6.77%5.50%7.05%-10.86%

Correlation

The correlation between CBE3.L and ICSH is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2013

0.04

The correlation between CBE3.L and ICSH shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBE3.L vs. ICSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBE3.L
CBE3.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
CBE3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBE3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBE3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CBE3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBE3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

ICSH
ICSH Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ICSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICSH Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
ICSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICSH Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBE3.L vs. ICSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Govt Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CBE3.L) and iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBE3.LICSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.08

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

0.70

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.81

1.62

+1.19

CBE3.L vs. ICSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBE3.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the ICSH Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBE3.L and ICSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBE3.LICSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

0.42

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.61

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.35

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.47

-0.04

Drawdowns

CBE3.L vs. ICSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBE3.L drawdown since its inception was -6.12%, smaller than the maximum ICSH drawdown of -15.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBE3.L and ICSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBE3.LICSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.12%

-15.48%

+9.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.10%

-3.68%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.10%

-11.20%

+10.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.19%

-11.37%

+6.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.12%

-15.48%

+9.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-6.22%

+5.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.06%

-5.21%

+4.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

1.59%

-1.25%

Volatility

CBE3.L vs. ICSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares € Govt Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CBE3.L) is 0.41%, while iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) has a volatility of 1.17%. This indicates that CBE3.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBE3.LICSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.41%

1.17%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.08%

4.23%

-3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19%

6.16%

-4.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.51%

7.58%

-6.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.28%

7.34%

-6.06%

CBE3.L vs. ICSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBE3.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ICSH's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CBE3.L vs. ICSH - Dividend Comparison

CBE3.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ICSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBE3.L
iShares € Govt Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ICSH
iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
4.34%4.55%5.24%4.78%1.66%0.42%1.21%2.61%2.20%1.36%0.88%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBE3.L and ICSH have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ICSH is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ICSH is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CBE3.L.

CBE3.L is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while ICSH is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CBE3.L and 0.08% for ICSH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBE3.L and ICSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer