CBAAX vs. ANCFX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CBAAX (American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio) and ANCFX (American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A) are both mutual funds - CBAAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by American Funds, while ANCFX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by American Funds. Over the past 10 years, CBAAX returned 9.11%/yr vs 14.82%/yr for ANCFX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CBAAX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for ANCFX.

Performance

CBAAX vs. ANCFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio (CBAAX) and American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBAAX achieves a 7.04% return, which is significantly lower than ANCFX's 14.34% return. Over the past 10 years, CBAAX has underperformed ANCFX with an annualized return of 9.11%, while ANCFX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.82% annualized return.

CBAAX

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 2.21%
• YTD: 7.04%
• 6M: 7.64%
• 1Y: 18.34%
• 3Y*: 14.62%
• 5Y*: 7.44%
• 10Y*: 9.11%

ANCFX

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 4.25%
• YTD: 14.34%
• 6M: 15.35%
• 1Y: 33.32%
• 3Y*: 25.80%
• 5Y*: 14.56%
• 10Y*: 14.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBAAX vs. ANCFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CBAAX American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio	7.04%	16.62%	11.27%	13.82%	-13.58%	13.79%	13.20%	19.42%	-4.63%	16.65%
ANCFX American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A	14.34%	24.21%	22.73%	25.86%	-16.66%	22.43%	14.92%	27.07%	-8.13%	22.80%

Correlation

The correlation between CBAAX and ANCFX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2012	0.95

The correlation between CBAAX and ANCFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CBAAX vs. ANCFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBAAX

CBAAX Risk / Return Rank: 57
CBAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
CBAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
CBAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
CBAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
CBAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

ANCFX

ANCFX Risk / Return Rank: 68
ANCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
ANCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
ANCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
ANCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
ANCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBAAX vs. ANCFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio (CBAAX) and American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CBAAX	ANCFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	2.46	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	3.32	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.44	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	3.17	-0.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.52	14.66	-3.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CBAAX vs. ANCFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the ANCFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBAAX and ANCFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CBAAX	ANCFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.22	2.46	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.87	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85	0.84	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	0.64	+0.27

Drawdowns

CBAAX vs. ANCFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBAAX drawdown since its inception was -23.16%, smaller than the maximum ANCFX drawdown of -53.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBAAX and ANCFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBAAX	ANCFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.16%	-53.29%	+30.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.31%	-10.66%	+3.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.62%	-17.97%	+7.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.72%	-25.07%	+4.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.16%	-33.93%	+10.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	-0.69%	+0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.93%	-7.32%	+4.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.63%	2.30%	-0.67%

Volatility

CBAAX vs. ANCFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio (CBAAX) is 2.68%, while American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that CBAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANCFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBAAX	ANCFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.68%	3.81%	-1.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.81%	10.79%	-3.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.48%	13.76%	-5.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.39%	16.80%	-6.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.81%	17.73%	-6.92%

CBAAX vs. ANCFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBAAX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ANCFX's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

CBAAX vs. ANCFX - Dividend Comparison

CBAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.42%, less than ANCFX's 7.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ANCFX American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A	7.48%	8.54%	8.90%	5.80%	4.98%	10.97%	2.61%	6.91%	9.31%	7.28%	4.71%	6.08%
CBAAX American Funds Moderate Growth and Income Portfolio	5.42%	5.81%	3.56%	2.26%	5.97%	4.95%	2.54%	3.80%	4.65%	3.43%	3.59%	3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBAAX and ANCFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, CBAAX and ANCFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CBAAX or ANCFX?

ANCFX has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to CBAAX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBAAX dropped -23.16% vs ANCFX's -53.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ANCFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.