CAXAX vs. MVGIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CAXAX (Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund) and MVGIX (MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CAXAX returned 9.53%/yr vs 9.22%/yr for MVGIX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CAXAX charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for MVGIX.

Performance

CAXAX vs. MVGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund (CAXAX) and MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund (MVGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAXAX achieves a 9.61% return, which is significantly higher than MVGIX's 2.95% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CAXAX having a 9.53% annualized return and MVGIX not far behind at 9.22%.

CAXAX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 2.56%
• YTD: 9.61%
• 6M: 9.67%
• 1Y: 21.07%
• 3Y*: 15.25%
• 5Y*: 7.98%
• 10Y*: 9.53%

MVGIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 2.95%
• 6M: 3.95%
• 1Y: 10.44%
• 3Y*: 13.00%
• 5Y*: 8.71%
• 10Y*: 9.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAXAX vs. MVGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CAXAX Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund	9.61%	22.46%	7.62%	10.71%	-11.04%	16.54%	5.48%	18.84%	-3.19%	17.11%
MVGIX MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund	2.95%	16.30%	12.64%	13.71%	-8.21%	16.84%	5.47%	20.59%	-2.40%	18.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CAXAX and MVGIX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2013	0.83

The correlation between CAXAX and MVGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CAXAX vs. MVGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAXAX

CAXAX Risk / Return Rank: 48
CAXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
CAXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CAXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
CAXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
CAXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

MVGIX

MVGIX Risk / Return Rank: 17
MVGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
MVGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
MVGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
MVGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
MVGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAXAX vs. MVGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund (CAXAX) and MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund (MVGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CAXAX	MVGIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	1.26	+0.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.05	1.82	+1.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.23	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	1.18	+1.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.68	3.94	+4.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CAXAX vs. MVGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAXAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the MVGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAXAX and MVGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CAXAX	MVGIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.17	1.26	+0.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.83	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	0.75	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.74	-0.06

Drawdowns

CAXAX vs. MVGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAXAX drawdown since its inception was -32.50%, which is greater than MVGIX's maximum drawdown of -30.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAXAX and MVGIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAXAX	MVGIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.50%	-30.19%	-2.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.44%	-8.65%	+0.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.76%	-8.70%	-2.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.76%	-18.01%	-4.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.50%	-30.19%	-2.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.12%	-4.35%	+2.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.81%	-2.91%	-0.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	2.59%	-0.17%

Volatility

CAXAX vs. MVGIX - Volatility Comparison

Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund (CAXAX) and MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund (MVGIX) have volatilities of 2.12% and 2.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CAXAX	MVGIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.12%	2.02%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.70%	6.26%	+1.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.72%	8.14%	+1.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.30%	10.54%	+1.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.83%	12.39%	+1.44%

CAXAX vs. MVGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAXAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than MVGIX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

CAXAX vs. MVGIX - Dividend Comparison

CAXAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.96%, less than MVGIX's 10.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CAXAX Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund	5.96%	6.53%	8.29%	2.38%	0.00%	1.75%	1.78%	4.67%	9.90%	2.88%	1.57%	1.18%
MVGIX MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund	10.63%	10.94%	7.84%	1.88%	3.98%	9.43%	1.55%	2.79%	4.98%	1.95%	1.60%	1.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CAXAX and MVGIX in my portfolio?

CAXAX and MVGIX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CAXAX or MVGIX?

CAXAX has higher volatility (2.12%) compared to MVGIX (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAXAX dropped -32.50% vs MVGIX's -30.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CAXAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.