CAUV.TO vs. DFIC
CAUV.TO (Avantis CIBC U.S. Small Cap Value ETF) and DFIC (DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAUV.TO is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while DFIC is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CAUV.TO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for DFIC.
Performance
CAUV.TO vs. DFIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CAUV.TO is traded in CAD, while DFIC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DFIC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
CAUV.TO
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFIC
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 1.89%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- YTD
- 14.42%
- 1Y
- 28.63%
- 3Y*
- 21.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAUV.TO vs. DFIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CAUV.TO Avantis CIBC U.S. Small Cap Value ETF | 9.21% |
DFIC DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF | 3.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAUV.TO and DFIC is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2026 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAUV.TO vs. DFIC — Risk / Return Rank
CAUV.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DFIC
CAUV.TO vs. DFIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis CIBC U.S. Small Cap Value ETF (CAUV.TO) and DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAUV.TO | DFIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.59 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.40 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAUV.TO vs. DFIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAUV.TO drawdown since its inception was -9.92%, smaller than the maximum DFIC drawdown of -17.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAUV.TO and DFIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAUV.TO | DFIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.92% | -17.66% | +7.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -1.34% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.53% | -2.95% | +0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.65% | — |
Volatility
CAUV.TO vs. DFIC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAUV.TO | DFIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.66% | 14.84% | +1.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 17.08% | -0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 17.08% | -0.42% |
CAUV.TO vs. DFIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAUV.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than DFIC's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAUV.TO vs. DFIC - Dividend Comparison
CAUV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than DFIC's 2.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAUV.TO Avantis CIBC U.S. Small Cap Value ETF | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DFIC DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF | 2.40% | 2.54% | 2.87% | 2.55% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAUV.TO and DFIC have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DFIC is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DFIC is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CAUV.TO.
CAUV.TO is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while DFIC is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CAUV.TO and 0.22% for DFIC.
Find the right allocation for CAUV.TO and DFIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer