CAUT.DE vs. QUTM.DE
CAUT.DE (Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and QUTM.DE (VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc) are both Technology Equities funds - CAUT.DE tracks the Solactive China Electric Vehicle and Battery while QUTM.DE tracks the MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CAUT.DE returned 33.26% vs 59.20% for QUTM.DE. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CAUT.DE charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for QUTM.DE.
Performance
CAUT.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAUT.DE achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than QUTM.DE's 33.86% return.
CAUT.DE
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- -12.56%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 33.26%
- 3Y*
- 1.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUTM.DE
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- 18.24%
- YTD
- 33.86%
- 6M
- 29.29%
- 1Y
- 59.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAUT.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CAUT.DE Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.51% | 32.71% |
QUTM.DE VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc | 33.86% | 14.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAUT.DE and QUTM.DE is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2025 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAUT.DE vs. QUTM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CAUT.DE
QUTM.DE
CAUT.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE) and VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CAUT.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.32 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 2.48 | -0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.42 | 5.81 | -1.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAUT.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 1.95 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.27 | 1.71 | -1.97 |
Drawdowns
CAUT.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAUT.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.24%, which is greater than QUTM.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAUT.DE and QUTM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAUT.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.24% | -23.74% | -45.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.89% | -23.74% | +7.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.96% | -3.42% | -40.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.53% | -7.71% | -37.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.51% | 10.15% | -2.64% |
Volatility
CAUT.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE) is 6.05%, while VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE) has a volatility of 12.36%. This indicates that CAUT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUTM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAUT.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.05% | 12.36% | -6.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.36% | 20.92% | -2.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.22% | 30.14% | -1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.13% | 30.16% | +2.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.13% | 30.16% | +2.97% |
CAUT.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAUT.DE has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than QUTM.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAUT.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CAUT.DE nor QUTM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CAUT.DE and QUTM.DE have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QUTM.DE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QUTM.DE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CAUT.DE.
CAUT.DE tracks Solactive China Electric Vehicle and Battery, while QUTM.DE tracks MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR). They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for CAUT.DE and 0.55% for QUTM.DE.
Find the right allocation for CAUT.DE and QUTM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer