CAUT.DE vs. KROP.DE
CAUT.DE (Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and KROP.DE (Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both Technology Equities funds from Global X - CAUT.DE tracks the Solactive China Electric Vehicle and Battery while KROP.DE tracks the Solactive AgTech and Food Innovation. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CAUT.DE returned 1.53%/yr vs -2.05%/yr for KROP.DE. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CAUT.DE charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROP.DE.
Performance
CAUT.DE vs. KROP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAUT.DE achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than KROP.DE's 17.14% return.
CAUT.DE
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- -12.56%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 33.26%
- 3Y*
- 1.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KROP.DE
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 17.14%
- 6M
- 14.58%
- 1Y
- 9.63%
- 3Y*
- -2.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAUT.DE vs. KROP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAUT.DE Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.51% | 27.42% | 9.31% | -35.25% | -25.68% |
KROP.DE Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 17.14% | -4.87% | -2.79% | -25.11% | -19.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAUT.DE and KROP.DE is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAUT.DE vs. KROP.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CAUT.DE
KROP.DE
CAUT.DE vs. KROP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE) and Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CAUT.DE | KROP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.12 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 1.04 | +1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.42 | 2.21 | +2.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAUT.DE | KROP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 0.62 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.27 | -0.47 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
CAUT.DE vs. KROP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAUT.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.24%, which is greater than KROP.DE's maximum drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAUT.DE and KROP.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAUT.DE | KROP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.24% | -52.74% | -16.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.89% | -9.22% | -6.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.32% | -27.28% | -15.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.96% | -41.08% | -2.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.53% | -36.46% | -9.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.51% | 4.34% | +3.17% |
Volatility
CAUT.DE vs. KROP.DE - Volatility Comparison
Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.05% compared to Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROP.DE) at 5.58%. This indicates that CAUT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAUT.DE | KROP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.05% | 5.58% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.36% | 12.02% | +6.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.22% | 15.43% | +12.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.13% | 19.64% | +13.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.13% | 19.64% | +13.49% |
CAUT.DE vs. KROP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAUT.DE has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than KROP.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAUT.DE vs. KROP.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CAUT.DE nor KROP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CAUT.DE and KROP.DE have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KROP.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KROP.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CAUT.DE.
CAUT.DE tracks Solactive China Electric Vehicle and Battery, while KROP.DE tracks Solactive AgTech and Food Innovation. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for CAUT.DE and 0.50% for KROP.DE.
Find the right allocation for CAUT.DE and KROP.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer