PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAUT.DE vs. DIGI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAUT.DE vs. DIGI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE) and HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF (DIGI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAUT.DE achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than DIGI.DE's 7.32% return.


CAUT.DE

1D
-2.17%
1M
-12.56%
YTD
0.51%
6M
5.19%
1Y
33.26%
3Y*
1.53%
5Y*
10Y*

DIGI.DE

1D
-0.08%
1M
2.07%
YTD
7.32%
6M
7.57%
1Y
12.73%
3Y*
10.98%
5Y*
4.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAUT.DE vs. DIGI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CAUT.DE
Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
0.51%27.42%9.31%-35.25%-26.40%
DIGI.DE
HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF
7.32%1.79%13.38%22.73%-17.98%

Correlation

The correlation between CAUT.DE and DIGI.DE is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAUT.DE vs. DIGI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAUT.DE
CAUT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
CAUT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAUT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAUT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CAUT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAUT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

DIGI.DE
DIGI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
DIGI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIGI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIGI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
DIGI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIGI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAUT.DE vs. DIGI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE) and HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF (DIGI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAUT.DEDIGI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.29

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

2.49

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.42

8.29

-3.87

CAUT.DE vs. DIGI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAUT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the DIGI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAUT.DE and DIGI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAUT.DEDIGI.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

1.51

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.27

0.35

-0.61

Drawdowns

CAUT.DE vs. DIGI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAUT.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.24%, which is greater than DIGI.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAUT.DE and DIGI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAUT.DEDIGI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.24%

-30.55%

-38.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.89%

-5.09%

-10.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.32%

-17.65%

-24.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.96%

-0.95%

-43.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.53%

-10.47%

-35.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.51%

1.53%

+5.98%

Volatility

CAUT.DE vs. DIGI.DE - Volatility Comparison

Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.05% compared to HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF (DIGI.DE) at 1.93%. This indicates that CAUT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIGI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAUT.DEDIGI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.05%

1.93%

+4.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.36%

5.60%

+12.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.22%

8.38%

+19.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.13%

19.34%

+13.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.13%

19.82%

+13.31%

CAUT.DE vs. DIGI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAUT.DE has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than DIGI.DE's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAUT.DE vs. DIGI.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CAUT.DE nor DIGI.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CAUT.DE and DIGI.DE have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CAUT.DE is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CAUT.DE is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for DIGI.DE.

CAUT.DE tracks Solactive China Electric Vehicle and Battery, while DIGI.DE tracks Tematica BITA Digital Infrastructure. They also come from different issuers: Global X and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for CAUT.DE and 0.69% for DIGI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAUT.DE and DIGI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer