CAUT.DE vs. AYEW.DE
CAUT.DE (Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and AYEW.DE (iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Technology Equities funds - CAUT.DE tracks the Solactive China Electric Vehicle and Battery while AYEW.DE tracks the MSCI World Information Technology ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CAUT.DE returned 1.53%/yr vs 27.99%/yr for AYEW.DE. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CAUT.DE charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for AYEW.DE.
Performance
CAUT.DE vs. AYEW.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAUT.DE achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than AYEW.DE's 24.61% return.
CAUT.DE
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- -12.56%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 33.26%
- 3Y*
- 1.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AYEW.DE
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- 15.12%
- YTD
- 24.61%
- 6M
- 23.38%
- 1Y
- 45.27%
- 3Y*
- 27.99%
- 5Y*
- 21.48%
- 10Y*
- —
CAUT.DE vs. AYEW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAUT.DE Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.51% | 27.42% | 9.31% | -35.25% | -26.40% |
AYEW.DE iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 24.61% | 9.65% | 33.73% | 55.77% | -19.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAUT.DE and AYEW.DE is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAUT.DE vs. AYEW.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CAUT.DE
AYEW.DE
CAUT.DE vs. AYEW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE) and iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (AYEW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CAUT.DE | AYEW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.37 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 3.01 | -0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.42 | 8.00 | -3.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAUT.DE | AYEW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 2.26 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.27 | 1.02 | -1.28 |
Drawdowns
CAUT.DE vs. AYEW.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAUT.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.24%, which is greater than AYEW.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAUT.DE and AYEW.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAUT.DE | AYEW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.24% | -31.36% | -37.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.89% | -14.98% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.32% | -29.01% | -13.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.96% | -2.13% | -41.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.53% | -7.74% | -37.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.51% | 5.64% | +1.87% |
Volatility
CAUT.DE vs. AYEW.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (CAUT.DE) is 6.05%, while iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (AYEW.DE) has a volatility of 6.77%. This indicates that CAUT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AYEW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAUT.DE | AYEW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.05% | 6.77% | -0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.36% | 14.89% | +3.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.22% | 19.98% | +8.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.13% | 22.77% | +10.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.13% | 23.48% | +9.65% |
CAUT.DE vs. AYEW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAUT.DE has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than AYEW.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAUT.DE vs. AYEW.DE - Dividend Comparison
CAUT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AYEW.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AYEW.DE iShares MSCI World Information Technology Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.46% | 0.82% | 0.40% | 0.65% | 0.12% |
CAUT.DE Global X China Electric Vehicle and Battery UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAUT.DE and AYEW.DE have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AYEW.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AYEW.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CAUT.DE.
CAUT.DE tracks Solactive China Electric Vehicle and Battery, while AYEW.DE tracks MSCI World Information Technology ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for CAUT.DE and 0.18% for AYEW.DE.
Find the right allocation for CAUT.DE and AYEW.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer