CAUSX vs. FNBGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Shelton Capital Management U.S. Government Securities Fund (CAUSX) and Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FNBGX).
CAUSX is managed by Shelton Capital Management. It was launched on Dec 3, 1985. FNBGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 20, 2005.
Performance
CAUSX vs. FNBGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CAUSX vs. FNBGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAUSX Shelton Capital Management U.S. Government Securities Fund | -0.46% | 6.38% | -0.20% | 3.83% | -7.74% | -2.99% | 5.33% | 4.98% | 0.48% | -0.34% |
FNBGX Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund | -0.35% | 5.30% | -6.18% | 3.20% | -29.89% | -5.17% | 17.58% | 14.24% | -1.62% | 1.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAUSX achieves a -0.46% return, which is significantly lower than FNBGX's -0.35% return.
CAUSX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- -0.32%
- 1Y
- 1.25%
- 3Y*
- 2.50%
- 5Y*
- 0.15%
- 10Y*
- 0.75%
FNBGX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- -0.35%
- 6M
- -0.98%
- 1Y
- -0.60%
- 3Y*
- -1.65%
- 5Y*
- -5.04%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CAUSX vs. FNBGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAUSX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FNBGX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CAUSX vs. FNBGX — Risk / Return Rank
CAUSX
FNBGX
CAUSX vs. FNBGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shelton Capital Management U.S. Government Securities Fund (CAUSX) and Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FNBGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CAUSX | FNBGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.38 | 0.01 | +0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.57 | 0.09 | +0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.01 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 0.14 | +0.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.16 | 0.30 | +1.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAUSX | FNBGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 0.01 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | -0.35 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | -0.08 | +0.81 |
Correlation
The correlation between CAUSX and FNBGX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CAUSX vs. FNBGX - Dividend Comparison
CAUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than FNBGX's 3.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAUSX Shelton Capital Management U.S. Government Securities Fund | 2.88% | 4.55% | 3.16% | 3.08% | 1.46% | 1.13% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.45% | 1.41% | 1.72% | 1.38% |
FNBGX Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund | 3.60% | 3.88% | 3.75% | 3.20% | 2.26% | 2.47% | 3.96% | 2.63% | 2.93% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CAUSX vs. FNBGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAUSX drawdown since its inception was -14.35%, smaller than the maximum FNBGX drawdown of -46.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAUSX and FNBGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAUSX | FNBGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.35% | -46.86% | +32.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.85% | -8.75% | +4.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.17% | -41.54% | +29.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.96% | -37.47% | +34.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.20% | -21.32% | +18.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 3.98% | -2.39% |
Volatility
CAUSX vs. FNBGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Shelton Capital Management U.S. Government Securities Fund (CAUSX) is 1.84%, while Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FNBGX) has a volatility of 3.50%. This indicates that CAUSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNBGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CAUSX | FNBGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.84% | 3.50% | -1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.07% | 6.02% | -2.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.29% | 10.47% | -5.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.91% | 14.61% | -9.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.04% | 14.30% | -10.26% |