PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CATY vs. WIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CATY vs. WIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) and Wipro Limited (WIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CATY achieves a 21.91% return, which is significantly higher than WIT's -25.23% return. Over the past 10 years, CATY has outperformed WIT with an annualized return of 9.87%, while WIT has yielded a comparatively lower 0.04% annualized return.


CATY

1D
2.96%
1M
2.55%
YTD
21.91%
6M
17.80%
1Y
38.68%
3Y*
27.14%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
9.87%

WIT

1D
-2.82%
1M
4.02%
YTD
-25.23%
6M
-24.70%
1Y
-23.74%
3Y*
-2.82%
5Y*
-11.15%
10Y*
0.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CATY vs. WIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CATY
Cathay General Bancorp
21.91%4.64%10.34%13.49%-2.11%37.74%-11.64%17.48%-18.47%13.40%
WIT
Wipro Limited
-25.23%-16.61%27.38%19.82%-51.78%73.10%51.23%-2.31%-5.94%13.38%

Correlation

The correlation between CATY and WIT is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2000

0.30

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CATY:

$3.92B

WIT:

$21.75B

EPS

CATY:

$4.84

WIT:

$12.70

PE Ratio

CATY:

12.01

WIT:

0.16

PEG Ratio

CATY:

1.97

WIT:

0.04

PS Ratio

CATY:

2.90

WIT:

0.02

PB Ratio

CATY:

1.31

WIT:

0.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

CATY:

$1.38B

WIT:

$935.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CATY:

$590.12M

WIT:

$272.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

CATY:

$347.76M

WIT:

$201.91B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CATY vs. WIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CATY
CATY Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
CATY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CATY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CATY Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
CATY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
CATY Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

WIT
WIT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
WIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
WIT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
WIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
WIT Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CATY vs. WIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) and Wipro Limited (WIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CATYWITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.90

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

-0.61

+3.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.05

-1.33

+9.37

CATY vs. WIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CATY Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the WIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CATY and WIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CATYWITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

-0.63

+2.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

-0.36

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.00

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.10

+0.13

Drawdowns

CATY vs. WIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CATY drawdown since its inception was -80.65%, which is greater than WIT's maximum drawdown of -74.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CATY and WIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CATYWITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.65%

-74.86%

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.33%

-38.98%

+26.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.73%

-48.81%

+19.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.11%

-60.42%

+20.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.71%

-60.42%

+4.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-54.99%

+54.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.00%

-30.88%

+7.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.82%

17.92%

-13.10%

Volatility

CATY vs. WIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) is 6.45%, while Wipro Limited (WIT) has a volatility of 21.62%. This indicates that CATY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CATYWITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.45%

21.62%

-15.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.83%

34.45%

-17.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.75%

38.02%

-12.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.55%

31.08%

-0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.59%

29.09%

+4.50%

Dividends

CATY vs. WIT - Dividend Comparison

CATY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than WIT's 5.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CATY
Cathay General Bancorp
2.48%2.81%2.86%3.05%3.33%2.95%3.85%3.26%3.07%2.06%1.97%1.79%
WIT
Wipro Limited
5.93%4.43%0.17%0.22%1.69%0.14%0.25%0.28%0.31%0.27%0.91%1.65%

Financials

CATY vs. WIT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cathay General Bancorp and Wipro Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B250.00B20222023202420252026
322.91M
246.13B
(CATY) Total Revenue
(WIT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CATY vs. WIT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cathay General Bancorp and Wipro Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
29.1%
Portfolio components
CATY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cathay General Bancorp reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 322.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

WIT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wipro Limited reported a gross profit of 71.55B and revenue of 246.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.1%.

CATY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cathay General Bancorp reported an operating income of 7.51M and revenue of 322.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.3%.

WIT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wipro Limited reported an operating income of 42.46B and revenue of 246.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.

CATY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cathay General Bancorp reported a net income of 86.89M and revenue of 322.91M, resulting in a net margin of 26.9%.

WIT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wipro Limited reported a net income of 35.56B and revenue of 246.13B, resulting in a net margin of 14.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CATY and WIT have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WIT has higher volatility (21.62%) compared to CATY (6.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CATY dropped -80.65% vs WIT's -74.86%.

CATY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CATY and WIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer