PortfoliosLab logo
WIT vs. CDW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between WIT and CDW is -0.40. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

WIT vs. CDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wipro Limited (WIT) and CDW Corporation (CDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

WIT:

30.08%

CDW:

31.93%

Max Drawdown

WIT:

-3.45%

CDW:

-44.83%

Current Drawdown

WIT:

-2.76%

CDW:

-29.76%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WIT:

$29.50B

CDW:

$23.58B

EPS

WIT:

$0.15

CDW:

$8.07

PE Ratio

WIT:

18.80

CDW:

22.17

PEG Ratio

WIT:

2.60

CDW:

1.53

PS Ratio

WIT:

0.03

CDW:

1.11

PB Ratio

WIT:

3.02

CDW:

10.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

WIT:

$665.84B

CDW:

$21.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WIT:

$203.57B

CDW:

$4.66B

EBITDA (TTM)

WIT:

$146.90B

CDW:

$1.46B

Returns By Period


WIT

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CDW

YTD

3.16%

1M

20.26%

6M

-9.86%

1Y

-18.58%

5Y*

13.27%

10Y*

18.33%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

WIT vs. CDW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WIT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WIT is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WIT is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WIT is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WIT is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WIT is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WIT is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

CDW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CDW is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CDW is 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CDW is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CDW is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CDW is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CDW is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WIT vs. CDW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wipro Limited (WIT) and CDW Corporation (CDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

WIT vs. CDW - Dividend Comparison

WIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than CDW's 1.39% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
WIT
Wipro Limited
2.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CDW
CDW Corporation
1.39%1.43%1.05%1.17%0.83%1.17%0.89%1.14%0.99%0.93%0.74%0.56%

Drawdowns

WIT vs. CDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WIT drawdown since its inception was -3.45%, smaller than the maximum CDW drawdown of -44.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIT and CDW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

WIT vs. CDW - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

WIT vs. CDW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wipro Limited and CDW Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20212022202320242025
223.19B
5.20B
(WIT) Total Revenue
(CDW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WIT vs. CDW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Wipro Limited and CDW Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%20212022202320242025
31.0%
21.6%
(WIT) Gross Margin
(CDW) Gross Margin
WIT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Wipro Limited reported a gross profit of 69.27B and revenue of 223.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.

CDW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CDW Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.12B and revenue of 5.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.6%.

WIT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Wipro Limited reported an operating income of 38.97B and revenue of 223.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.5%.

CDW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CDW Corporation reported an operating income of 361.40M and revenue of 5.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.

WIT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Wipro Limited reported a net income of 33.54B and revenue of 223.19B, resulting in a net margin of 15.0%.

CDW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CDW Corporation reported a net income of 224.90M and revenue of 5.20B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.