CATF vs. ZTAX
CATF (American Century California Municipal Bond ETF) and ZTAX (X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CATF returned 7.60% vs 7.61% for ZTAX. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. CATF charges 0.27%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for ZTAX.
Performance
CATF vs. ZTAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CATF achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly lower than ZTAX's 3.16% return.
CATF
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 2.24%
- 1Y
- 7.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZTAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 3.16%
- 6M
- -1.79%
- 1Y
- 7.61%
- 3Y*
- 4.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CATF vs. ZTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CATF American Century California Municipal Bond ETF | 2.29% | 3.78% | 0.62% |
ZTAX X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF | 3.16% | -1.02% | 5.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between CATF and ZTAX is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024 | -0.02 |
The correlation between CATF and ZTAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CATF vs. ZTAX — Risk / Return Rank
CATF
ZTAX
CATF vs. ZTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century California Municipal Bond ETF (CATF) and X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF (ZTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CATF | ZTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.10 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 0.70 | +2.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.61 | 1.69 | +7.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CATF vs. ZTAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CATF drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum ZTAX drawdown of -15.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CATF and ZTAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CATF | ZTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.83% | -15.33% | +10.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | -10.99% | +8.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -9.42% | +9.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.24% | -6.82% | +5.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 4.52% | -3.73% |
Volatility
CATF vs. ZTAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century California Municipal Bond ETF (CATF) is 0.80%, while X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF (ZTAX) has a volatility of 19.58%. This indicates that CATF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZTAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CATF | ZTAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.80% | 19.58% | -18.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.22% | 28.24% | -26.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07% | 32.31% | -29.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.28% | 28.90% | -24.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.28% | 28.90% | -24.62% |
CATF vs. ZTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CATF has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than ZTAX's 1.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
CATF vs. ZTAX - Dividend Comparison
CATF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than ZTAX's 4.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CATF American Century California Municipal Bond ETF | 3.49% | 3.40% | 1.32% | 0.00% |
ZTAX X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF | 4.43% | 4.58% | 4.55% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CATF and ZTAX have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZTAX has higher volatility (19.58%) compared to CATF (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CATF dropped -4.83% vs ZTAX's -15.33%.
On 1-year performance, ZTAX leads with 7.61% vs 7.60% for CATF. On fees, CATF is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, CATF has been the lower-risk option at 0.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ZTAX has performed better with a 7.61% return vs 7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CATF is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for ZTAX.
ZTAX has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 3.49% for CATF.
They also come from different issuers: American Century and X-Square. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for CATF and 1.14% for ZTAX.
CATF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CATF and ZTAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer