PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CATF vs. ZTAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CATF vs. ZTAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century California Municipal Bond ETF (CATF) and X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF (ZTAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CATF achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly lower than ZTAX's 3.16% return.


CATF

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.47%
YTD
2.29%
6M
2.24%
1Y
7.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZTAX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.70%
YTD
3.16%
6M
-1.79%
1Y
7.61%
3Y*
4.78%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CATF vs. ZTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CATF
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
2.29%3.78%0.62%
ZTAX
X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF
3.16%-1.02%5.33%

Correlation

The correlation between CATF and ZTAX is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024

-0.02

The correlation between CATF and ZTAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CATF vs. ZTAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CATF
CATF Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CATF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CATF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CATF Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CATF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CATF Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

ZTAX
ZTAX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
ZTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CATF vs. ZTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century California Municipal Bond ETF (CATF) and X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF (ZTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CATFZTAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.10

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

0.70

+2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.61

1.69

+7.93

CATF vs. ZTAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CATF Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the ZTAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CATF and ZTAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CATF vs. ZTAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CATF drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum ZTAX drawdown of -15.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CATF and ZTAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CATFZTAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-15.33%

+10.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.77%

-10.99%

+8.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-9.42%

+9.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.24%

-6.82%

+5.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

4.52%

-3.73%

Volatility

CATF vs. ZTAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century California Municipal Bond ETF (CATF) is 0.80%, while X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF (ZTAX) has a volatility of 19.58%. This indicates that CATF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZTAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CATFZTAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.80%

19.58%

-18.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.22%

28.24%

-26.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07%

32.31%

-29.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.28%

28.90%

-24.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.28%

28.90%

-24.62%

CATF vs. ZTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CATF has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than ZTAX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

CATF vs. ZTAX - Dividend Comparison

CATF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than ZTAX's 4.43% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CATF
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
3.49%3.40%1.32%0.00%
ZTAX
X-Square Municipal Income Tax Free ETF
4.43%4.58%4.55%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


CATF and ZTAX have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZTAX has higher volatility (19.58%) compared to CATF (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CATF dropped -4.83% vs ZTAX's -15.33%.

On 1-year performance, ZTAX leads with 7.61% vs 7.60% for CATF. On fees, CATF is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, CATF has been the lower-risk option at 0.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ZTAX has performed better with a 7.61% return vs 7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CATF is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for ZTAX.

ZTAX has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 3.49% for CATF.

They also come from different issuers: American Century and X-Square. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for CATF and 1.14% for ZTAX.

CATF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CATF and ZTAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer