PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CATF vs. TAXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CATF vs. TAXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century California Municipal Bond ETF (CATF) and American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF (TAXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CATF having a 2.29% return and TAXF slightly lower at 2.22%.


CATF

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.47%
YTD
2.29%
6M
2.24%
1Y
7.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TAXF

1D
0.00%
1M
1.52%
YTD
2.22%
6M
2.18%
1Y
7.39%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
1.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CATF vs. TAXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CATF and TAXF is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024

0.74

The correlation between CATF and TAXF shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CATF vs. TAXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CATF
CATF Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CATF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CATF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CATF Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CATF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CATF Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

TAXF
TAXF Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
TAXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAXF Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
TAXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAXF Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CATF vs. TAXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century California Municipal Bond ETF (CATF) and American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF (TAXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CATFTAXFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.53

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

2.53

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.61

9.09

+0.53

CATF vs. TAXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CATF Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the TAXF Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CATF and TAXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CATF vs. TAXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CATF drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum TAXF drawdown of -13.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CATF and TAXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CATFTAXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-13.93%

+9.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.77%

-2.93%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.22%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.24%

-3.13%

+1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

0.81%

-0.02%

Volatility

CATF vs. TAXF - Volatility Comparison

American Century California Municipal Bond ETF (CATF) has a higher volatility of 0.80% compared to American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF (TAXF) at 0.75%. This indicates that CATF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CATFTAXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.80%

0.75%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.22%

2.28%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07%

3.00%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.28%

4.20%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.28%

4.64%

-0.36%

CATF vs. TAXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CATF has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than TAXF's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

CATF vs. TAXF - Dividend Comparison

CATF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than TAXF's 3.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CATF
American Century California Municipal Bond ETF
3.49%3.40%1.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TAXF
American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF
3.76%3.68%3.38%2.93%2.05%1.58%2.13%2.64%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


CATF and TAXF have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CATF has higher volatility (0.80%) compared to TAXF (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CATF dropped -4.83% vs TAXF's -13.93%.

On 1-year performance, CATF leads with 7.60% vs 7.39% for TAXF. On fees, CATF is cheaper at 0.27% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CATF has performed better with a 7.60% return vs 7.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CATF is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for TAXF.

TAXF has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 3.49% for CATF.

Their fees differ too: 0.27% for CATF and 0.29% for TAXF.

CATF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CATF and TAXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer