CATF vs. SDSI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CATF (American Century California Municipal Bond ETF) and SDSI (American Century Short Duration Strategic Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CATF is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by American Century, while SDSI is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. 1-3 Year Government/Credit Bond Index. CATF is actively managed, while SDSI is passively managed. Over the past year, CATF returned 7.60% vs 4.84% for SDSI. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CATF charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for SDSI.

Performance

CATF vs. SDSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century California Municipal Bond ETF (CATF) and American Century Short Duration Strategic Income ETF (SDSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CATF achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly higher than SDSI's 1.35% return.

CATF

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 1.47%
• YTD: 2.29%
• 6M: 2.24%
• 1Y: 7.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SDSI

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.35%
• 6M: 1.54%
• 1Y: 4.84%
• 3Y*: 5.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CATF vs. SDSI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CATF American Century California Municipal Bond ETF	2.29%	3.78%	0.62%
SDSI American Century Short Duration Strategic Income ETF	1.35%	6.54%	2.32%

Correlation

The correlation between CATF and SDSI is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024	0.44

Return for Risk

CATF vs. SDSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CATF

CATF Risk / Return Rank: 77
CATF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
CATF Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
CATF Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CATF Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
CATF Martin Ratio Rank: 59

SDSI

SDSI Risk / Return Rank: 91
SDSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
SDSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
SDSI Omega Ratio Rank: 93
SDSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
SDSI Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CATF vs. SDSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century California Municipal Bond ETF (CATF) and American Century Short Duration Strategic Income ETF (SDSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CATF	SDSI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	3.03	-0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.78	4.58	-0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.61	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.76	4.15	-1.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.61	19.56	-9.95

CATF vs. SDSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CATF Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the SDSI Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CATF and SDSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CATF vs. SDSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CATF drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, which is greater than SDSI's maximum drawdown of -1.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CATF and SDSI.

Drawdown Indicators

	CATF	SDSI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.83%	-1.29%	-3.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.77%	-1.17%	-1.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-0.07%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.24%	-0.24%	-1.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.79%	0.25%	+0.54%

Volatility

CATF vs. SDSI - Volatility Comparison

American Century California Municipal Bond ETF (CATF) has a higher volatility of 0.80% compared to American Century Short Duration Strategic Income ETF (SDSI) at 0.49%. This indicates that CATF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CATF	SDSI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.80%	0.49%	+0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.22%	1.20%	+1.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.07%	1.61%	+1.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.28%	2.27%	+2.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.28%	2.27%	+2.01%

CATF vs. SDSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CATF has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than SDSI's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

CATF vs. SDSI - Dividend Comparison

CATF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than SDSI's 4.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CATF American Century California Municipal Bond ETF	3.49%	3.40%	1.32%	0.00%	0.00%
SDSI American Century Short Duration Strategic Income ETF	4.78%	4.91%	5.49%	5.37%	0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CATF and SDSI in my portfolio?

CATF and SDSI have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CATF or SDSI?

CATF has higher volatility (0.80%) compared to SDSI (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CATF dropped -4.83% vs SDSI's -1.29%.

Which ETF is better, CATF or SDSI?

On 1-year performance, CATF leads with 7.60% vs 4.84% for SDSI. On fees, CATF is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, SDSI has been the lower-risk option at 0.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CATF or SDSI?

Over the 1-year period, CATF has performed better with a 7.60% return vs 4.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CATF or SDSI?

CATF is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for SDSI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CATF or SDSI?

SDSI has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 3.49% for CATF.

What is the main difference between CATF and SDSI?

CATF is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while SDSI is Short-Term Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for CATF and 0.33% for SDSI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SDSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.