CAT vs. LMT
CAT (Caterpillar Inc.) and LMT (Lockheed Martin Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — CAT in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery, LMT in Aerospace & Defense. Over the past 10 years, CAT returned 30.90%/yr vs 11.04%/yr for LMT. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CAT vs. LMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAT achieves a 58.52% return, which is significantly higher than LMT's 9.57% return. Over the past 10 years, CAT has outperformed LMT with an annualized return of 30.90%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively lower 11.04% annualized return.
CAT
- 1D
- -3.85%
- 1M
- -2.44%
- YTD
- 58.52%
- 6M
- 50.56%
- 1Y
- 161.94%
- 3Y*
- 61.01%
- 5Y*
- 32.30%
- 10Y*
- 30.90%
LMT
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 9.57%
- 6M
- 17.20%
- 1Y
- 12.52%
- 3Y*
- 7.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 11.04%
CAT vs. LMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAT Caterpillar Inc. | 58.52% | 60.30% | 24.66% | 25.95% | 18.60% | 15.95% | 26.97% | 19.51% | -17.56% | 75.03% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 9.57% | 2.47% | 10.02% | -4.31% | 40.48% | 3.15% | -6.49% | 52.55% | -16.35% | 31.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAT and LMT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1977 | 0.26 |
The correlation between CAT and LMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.30 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CAT:
$421.21B
LMT:
$121.04B
CAT:
$20.07
LMT:
$20.61
CAT:
45.05
LMT:
25.41
CAT:
6.00
LMT:
1.62
CAT:
22.57
LMT:
16.16
CAT:
$70.76B
LMT:
$75.12B
CAT:
$23.01B
LMT:
$7.37B
CAT:
$15.31B
LMT:
$8.09B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAT vs. LMT — Risk / Return Rank
CAT
LMT
CAT vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CAT | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.11 | +0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.74 | 0.50 | +11.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 38.98 | 1.21 | +37.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAT | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.76 | 0.47 | +4.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | 0.38 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 | 0.47 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.38 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
CAT vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAT drawdown since its inception was -73.43%, smaller than the maximum LMT drawdown of -79.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAT and LMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAT | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.43% | -79.29% | +5.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.88% | -25.15% | +11.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.05% | -31.79% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.05% | -31.79% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.36% | -36.67% | -6.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.85% | -22.09% | +18.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.74% | -26.84% | +7.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 10.41% | -6.24% |
Volatility
CAT vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison
Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) has a higher volatility of 11.26% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 5.27%. This indicates that CAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAT | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.26% | 5.27% | +5.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.35% | 19.58% | +7.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.24% | 26.59% | +7.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.67% | 22.87% | +7.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.88% | 23.71% | +7.17% |
Dividends
CAT vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison
CAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than LMT's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAT Caterpillar Inc. | 0.67% | 1.02% | 1.49% | 1.69% | 1.93% | 2.07% | 2.26% | 2.56% | 2.58% | 1.97% | 3.32% | 4.33% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 2.61% | 2.76% | 2.62% | 2.68% | 2.34% | 2.98% | 2.76% | 2.31% | 3.13% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 2.83% |
Financials
CAT vs. LMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Caterpillar Inc. and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CAT vs. LMT - Profitability Comparison
CAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.11B and revenue of 17.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.1%.
LMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.08B and revenue of 18.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.
CAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported an operating income of 3.09B and revenue of 17.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.
LMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported an operating income of 2.06B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.
CAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 17.42B, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.
LMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a net income of 1.49B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CAT and LMT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAT has higher volatility (11.26%) compared to LMT (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAT dropped -73.43% vs LMT's -79.29%.
CAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.76 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAT and LMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer