PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CASY vs. HLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CASY vs. HLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CASY achieves a 58.10% return, which is significantly higher than HLT's 20.95% return. Over the past 10 years, CASY has underperformed HLT with an annualized return of 23.10%, while HLT has yielded a comparatively higher 48.07% annualized return.


CASY

1D
-2.54%
1M
2.30%
YTD
58.10%
6M
59.77%
1Y
73.01%
3Y*
59.16%
5Y*
34.38%
10Y*
23.10%

HLT

1D
0.34%
1M
9.84%
YTD
20.95%
6M
21.54%
1Y
42.62%
3Y*
35.44%
5Y*
22.62%
10Y*
48.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CASY vs. HLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CASY
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
58.10%40.12%45.01%23.27%14.49%11.25%13.24%25.12%15.59%-4.99%
HLT
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
20.95%16.49%36.11%44.68%-18.72%40.20%0.47%55.48%-9.40%829.98%

Correlation

The correlation between CASY and HLT is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013

0.28

The correlation between CASY and HLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CASY:

$32.44B

HLT:

$80.53B

EPS

CASY:

$19.17

HLT:

$6.50

PE Ratio

CASY:

45.51

HLT:

53.41

PEG Ratio

CASY:

2.17

HLT:

0.86

PS Ratio

CASY:

1.85

HLT:

6.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

CASY:

$17.56B

HLT:

$12.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CASY:

$4.32B

HLT:

$5.44B

EBITDA (TTM)

CASY:

$1.58B

HLT:

$3.00B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CASY vs. HLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CASY
CASY Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CASY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CASY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CASY Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CASY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CASY Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

HLT
HLT Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
HLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLT Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
HLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLT Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CASY vs. HLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CASYHLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.32

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.57

4.16

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.05

9.69

+8.36

CASY vs. HLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CASY Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the HLT Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CASY and HLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CASY vs. HLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CASY drawdown since its inception was -74.32%, which is greater than HLT's maximum drawdown of -50.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CASY and HLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CASYHLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.32%

-50.82%

-23.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.07%

-10.29%

-5.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.07%

-26.35%

+10.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.13%

-32.65%

+15.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.41%

-50.82%

+17.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.79%

0.00%

-4.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.15%

-9.71%

-5.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.06%

4.41%

-0.35%

Volatility

CASY vs. HLT - Volatility Comparison

Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY) has a higher volatility of 20.80% compared to Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) at 6.73%. This indicates that CASY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CASYHLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.80%

6.73%

+14.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.73%

17.23%

+8.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.11%

22.99%

+8.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.82%

27.07%

+0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.15%

181.03%

-152.88%

Dividends

CASY vs. HLT - Dividend Comparison

CASY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, more than HLT's 0.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CASY
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
0.26%0.39%0.47%0.59%0.65%0.69%0.72%0.77%0.86%0.89%0.77%0.70%
HLT
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
0.17%0.21%0.24%0.33%0.36%0.00%0.13%0.54%0.84%31.40%1.03%0.65%

Financials

CASY vs. HLT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Casey's General Stores, Inc. and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
4.57B
2.94B
(CASY) Total Revenue
(HLT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CASY vs. HLT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Casey's General Stores, Inc. and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
26.0%
40.3%
Portfolio components
CASY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Casey's General Stores, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.19B and revenue of 4.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.0%.

HLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.18B and revenue of 2.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.

CASY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Casey's General Stores, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.13B and revenue of 4.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 68.5%.

HLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 678.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.

CASY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Casey's General Stores, Inc. reported a net income of 162.68M and revenue of 4.57B, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.

HLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 385.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CASY and HLT have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CASY has higher volatility (20.80%) compared to HLT (6.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CASY dropped -74.32% vs HLT's -50.82%.

CASY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CASY and HLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer