CASV.TO vs. VVL.TO
CASV.TO (Avantis CIBC Global Small Cap Value ETF) and VVL.TO (Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD) are both exchange-traded funds - CASV.TO is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while VVL.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard. Both are actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CASV.TO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for VVL.TO.
Performance
CASV.TO vs. VVL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CASV.TO
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VVL.TO
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 3.63%
- 6M
- 11.20%
- YTD
- 16.75%
- 1Y
- 28.88%
- 3Y*
- 20.66%
- 5Y*
- 14.63%
- 10Y*
- 12.23%
CASV.TO vs. VVL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CASV.TO Avantis CIBC Global Small Cap Value ETF | 13.42% |
VVL.TO Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD | 15.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between CASV.TO and VVL.TO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CASV.TO vs. VVL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CASV.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VVL.TO
CASV.TO vs. VVL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis CIBC Global Small Cap Value ETF (CASV.TO) and Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CASV.TO | VVL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.18 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.50 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CASV.TO vs. VVL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CASV.TO drawdown since its inception was -3.70%, smaller than the maximum VVL.TO drawdown of -43.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CASV.TO and VVL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CASV.TO | VVL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -43.88% | +40.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.31% | -0.37% | -1.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.01% | -5.74% | +4.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.26% | — |
Volatility
CASV.TO vs. VVL.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CASV.TO | VVL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.96% | 13.86% | +2.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.96% | 16.07% | -0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.96% | 18.77% | -2.81% |
CASV.TO vs. VVL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CASV.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VVL.TO's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
CASV.TO vs. VVL.TO - Dividend Comparison
CASV.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VVL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASV.TO Avantis CIBC Global Small Cap Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VVL.TO Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD | 1.62% | 1.89% | 2.19% | 2.69% | 2.57% | 1.50% | 1.70% | 2.65% | 2.15% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CASV.TO and VVL.TO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VVL.TO is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VVL.TO is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for CASV.TO.
CASV.TO is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while VVL.TO is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CASV.TO and 0.38% for VVL.TO.
Find the right allocation for CASV.TO and VVL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer