CASH vs. PWR
CASH (Meta Financial Group, Inc.) and PWR (Quanta Services, Inc.) are both stocks. CASH operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while PWR operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CASH returned 17.45%/yr vs 41.34%/yr for PWR. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CASH vs. PWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CASH achieves a 15.67% return, which is significantly lower than PWR's 71.70% return. Over the past 10 years, CASH has underperformed PWR with an annualized return of 17.45%, while PWR has yielded a comparatively higher 41.34% annualized return.
CASH
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 15.67%
- 6M
- 11.54%
- 1Y
- 10.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 9.35%
- 10Y*
- 17.45%
PWR
- 1D
- 2.35%
- 1M
- -5.93%
- YTD
- 71.70%
- 6M
- 66.26%
- 1Y
- 102.38%
- 3Y*
- 57.55%
- 5Y*
- 51.64%
- 10Y*
- 41.34%
CASH vs. PWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASH Meta Financial Group, Inc. | 15.67% | -3.25% | 39.47% | 23.45% | -27.48% | 63.82% | 0.94% | 89.68% | -36.81% | -9.39% |
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 71.70% | 33.70% | 46.60% | 51.70% | 24.63% | 59.50% | 77.74% | 35.84% | -22.93% | 12.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between CASH and PWR is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 1998 | 0.17 |
The correlation between CASH and PWR shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.36 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CASH:
$1.78B
PWR:
$110.16B
CASH:
$8.39
PWR:
$7.29
CASH:
9.78
PWR:
99.36
CASH:
0.61
PWR:
4.92
CASH:
2.89
PWR:
3.66
CASH:
2.09
PWR:
12.18
CASH:
$639.61M
PWR:
$29.99B
CASH:
$477.70M
PWR:
$4.08B
CASH:
$180.97M
PWR:
$2.40B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CASH vs. PWR — Risk / Return Rank
CASH
PWR
CASH vs. PWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Financial Group, Inc. (CASH) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CASH | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.46 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.48 | 6.02 | -5.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.95 | 18.91 | -17.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CASH vs. PWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CASH drawdown since its inception was -83.66%, smaller than the maximum PWR drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CASH and PWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CASH | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.66% | -97.07% | +13.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.21% | -17.11% | -5.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.20% | -33.89% | +8.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.84% | -33.89% | -16.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.90% | -45.53% | -19.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.86% | -7.75% | -10.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.88% | -46.83% | +23.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.12% | 5.43% | +5.69% |
Volatility
CASH vs. PWR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Meta Financial Group, Inc. (CASH) is 7.63%, while Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) has a volatility of 13.30%. This indicates that CASH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CASH | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.63% | 13.30% | -5.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.75% | 30.80% | -8.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.84% | 37.25% | -8.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.64% | 35.82% | -2.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.31% | 33.80% | +7.51% |
Dividends
CASH vs. PWR - Dividend Comparison
CASH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, more than PWR's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASH Meta Financial Group, Inc. | 0.24% | 0.28% | 0.27% | 0.38% | 0.46% | 0.34% | 0.55% | 0.55% | 0.96% | 0.56% | 0.51% | 1.13% |
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CASH vs. PWR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Quanta Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CASH vs. PWR - Profitability Comparison
CASH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 151.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PWR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 7.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.1%.
CASH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 151.18M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
PWR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 338.78M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.
CASH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 72.84M and revenue of 151.18M, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
PWR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 220.63M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CASH and PWR have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PWR has higher volatility (13.30%) compared to CASH (7.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CASH dropped -83.66% vs PWR's -97.07%.
PWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CASH and PWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer