PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CASH vs. DHR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CASH vs. DHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meta Financial Group, Inc. (CASH) and Danaher Corporation (DHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CASH achieves a 15.67% return, which is significantly higher than DHR's -20.72% return. Over the past 10 years, CASH has outperformed DHR with an annualized return of 17.45%, while DHR has yielded a comparatively lower 11.22% annualized return.


CASH

1D
-2.54%
1M
2.73%
YTD
15.67%
6M
11.54%
1Y
10.58%
3Y*
19.67%
5Y*
9.35%
10Y*
17.45%

DHR

1D
0.56%
1M
11.85%
YTD
-20.72%
6M
-20.48%
1Y
-9.13%
3Y*
-4.95%
5Y*
-3.10%
10Y*
11.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CASH vs. DHR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CASH
Meta Financial Group, Inc.
15.67%-3.25%39.47%23.45%-27.48%63.82%0.94%89.68%-36.81%-9.39%
DHR
Danaher Corporation
-20.72%0.35%-0.35%-1.22%-19.02%48.57%45.34%49.55%11.80%20.01%

Correlation

The correlation between CASH and DHR is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 1993

0.14

The correlation between CASH and DHR shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CASH:

$1.78B

DHR:

$128.80B

EPS

CASH:

$8.39

DHR:

$5.17

PE Ratio

CASH:

9.78

DHR:

35.04

PS Ratio

CASH:

2.89

DHR:

5.22

PB Ratio

CASH:

2.09

DHR:

2.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

CASH:

$639.61M

DHR:

$24.78B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CASH:

$477.70M

DHR:

$15.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

CASH:

$180.97M

DHR:

$6.69B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CASH vs. DHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CASH
CASH Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
CASH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CASH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
CASH Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
CASH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
CASH Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

DHR
DHR Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
DHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHR Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
DHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHR Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CASH vs. DHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meta Financial Group, Inc. (CASH) and Danaher Corporation (DHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CASHDHRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

0.97

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

-0.28

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.95

-0.66

+1.61

CASH vs. DHR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CASH Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is higher than the DHR Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CASH and DHR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CASH vs. DHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CASH drawdown since its inception was -83.66%, which is greater than DHR's maximum drawdown of -45.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CASH and DHR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CASHDHRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.66%

-45.80%

-37.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.21%

-32.97%

+10.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.20%

-41.72%

+16.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.84%

-43.81%

-7.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.90%

-43.81%

-21.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.86%

-37.15%

+19.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.88%

-10.23%

-12.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.12%

13.92%

-2.80%

Volatility

CASH vs. DHR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Meta Financial Group, Inc. (CASH) is 7.63%, while Danaher Corporation (DHR) has a volatility of 9.12%. This indicates that CASH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CASHDHRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.63%

9.12%

-1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.75%

19.51%

+3.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.84%

28.16%

+0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.64%

28.04%

+5.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.31%

25.56%

+15.75%

Dividends

CASH vs. DHR - Dividend Comparison

CASH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than DHR's 0.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CASH
Meta Financial Group, Inc.
0.24%0.28%0.27%0.38%0.46%0.34%0.55%0.55%0.96%0.56%0.51%1.13%
DHR
Danaher Corporation
0.75%0.56%0.47%12.64%0.38%0.26%0.32%0.44%0.62%0.60%32.55%0.58%

Financials

CASH vs. DHR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Danaher Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
151.18M
5.95B
(CASH) Total Revenue
(DHR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CASH vs. DHR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Meta Financial Group, Inc. and Danaher Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
60.3%
Portfolio components
CASH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 151.18M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

DHR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaher Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.59B and revenue of 5.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.3%.

CASH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 151.18M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

DHR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaher Corporation reported an operating income of 1.34B and revenue of 5.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.6%.

CASH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 72.84M and revenue of 151.18M, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.

DHR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaher Corporation reported a net income of 1.03B and revenue of 5.95B, resulting in a net margin of 17.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CASH and DHR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DHR has higher volatility (9.12%) compared to CASH (7.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CASH dropped -83.66% vs DHR's -45.80%.

CASH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CASH and DHR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer