CASH.TO vs. QDF

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

CASH.TO (Global X High Interest Savings ETF) and QDF (FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CASH.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Global X, while QDF is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index. CASH.TO is actively managed, while QDF is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CASH.TO returned 3.60%/yr vs 20.05%/yr for QDF. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CASH.TO charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for QDF.

Performance

CASH.TO vs. QDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) and FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CASH.TO is traded in CAD, while QDF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QDF values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CASH.TO achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly lower than QDF's 12.65% return.

CASH.TO

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.15%
• YTD: 0.91%
• 6M: 1.03%
• 1Y: 2.23%
• 3Y*: 3.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QDF

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: 3.47%
• YTD: 12.65%
• 6M: 11.55%
• 1Y: 30.98%
• 3Y*: 20.05%
• 5Y*: 15.04%
• 10Y*: 13.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CASH.TO vs. QDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF	0.91%	2.45%	4.53%	5.11%	2.38%	0.08%
QDF FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund	12.65%	11.25%	26.86%	16.86%	-6.56%	7.91%

Correlation

The correlation between CASH.TO and QDF is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021	0.00

Return for Risk

CASH.TO vs. QDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CASH.TO

CASH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
CASH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CASH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CASH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CASH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CASH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100

QDF

QDF Risk / Return Rank: 77
QDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
QDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
QDF Omega Ratio Rank: 77
QDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
QDF Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CASH.TO vs. QDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) and FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CASH.TO	QDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	9.56	2.30	+7.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	26.15	3.24	+22.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	7.03	1.40	+5.62
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	113.10	4.35	+108.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	389.01	16.40	+372.61

CASH.TO vs. QDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CASH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 9.56, which is higher than the QDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CASH.TO and QDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CASH.TO vs. QDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CASH.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.80%, smaller than the maximum QDF drawdown of -31.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CASH.TO and QDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	CASH.TO	QDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.80%	-31.10%	+30.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.02%	-6.63%	+6.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.06%	-18.64%	+18.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.64%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.08%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.00%	-3.30%	+3.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.01%	1.76%	-1.75%

Volatility

CASH.TO vs. QDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) is 0.08%, while FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that CASH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CASH.TO	QDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.08%	4.33%	-4.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.16%	9.81%	-9.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24%	12.51%	-12.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.61%	16.69%	-16.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.61%	18.45%	-17.84%

CASH.TO vs. QDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CASH.TO has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than QDF's 0.37% expense ratio.

Dividends

CASH.TO vs. QDF - Dividend Comparison

CASH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than QDF's 1.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF	2.19%	2.53%	4.37%	5.05%	2.30%	0.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QDF FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund	1.50%	1.65%	1.93%	2.19%	2.45%	1.90%	2.38%	3.05%	4.29%	2.70%	3.07%	3.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CASH.TO and QDF in my portfolio?

CASH.TO and QDF have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CASH.TO or QDF?

On fees, CASH.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CASH.TO or QDF?

CASH.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for QDF.

What is the main difference between CASH.TO and QDF?

CASH.TO is categorized as Money Market, while QDF is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and FlexShares. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for CASH.TO and 0.37% for QDF.