CASH.TO vs. DGRO
CASH.TO (Global X High Interest Savings ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CASH.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Global X, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. CASH.TO is actively managed, while DGRO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CASH.TO returned 3.60%/yr vs 18.49%/yr for DGRO. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. CASH.TO charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
CASH.TO vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CASH.TO is traded in CAD, while DGRO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DGRO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CASH.TO achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 12.09% return.
CASH.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- 2.23%
- 3Y*
- 3.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 5.35%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 6M
- 10.83%
- 1Y
- 26.90%
- 3Y*
- 18.49%
- 5Y*
- 14.07%
- 10Y*
- 14.49%
CASH.TO vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 0.91% | 2.45% | 4.53% | 5.11% | 2.38% | 0.08% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 12.09% | 10.41% | 26.49% | 7.84% | -2.07% | 7.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between CASH.TO and DGRO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CASH.TO vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
CASH.TO
DGRO
CASH.TO vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CASH.TO | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +22.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 7.03 | 1.43 | +5.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 113.10 | 4.07 | +109.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 389.01 | 15.16 | +373.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CASH.TO vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CASH.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.80%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -29.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CASH.TO and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CASH.TO | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -29.39% | +28.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | -6.16% | +6.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.06% | -15.15% | +15.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -3.06% | +3.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 1.66% | -1.65% |
Volatility
CASH.TO vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) is 0.08%, while iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) has a volatility of 2.90%. This indicates that CASH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CASH.TO | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.08% | 2.90% | -2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.16% | 7.79% | -7.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24% | 10.44% | -10.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.61% | 15.06% | -14.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.61% | 17.75% | -17.14% |
CASH.TO vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CASH.TO has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CASH.TO vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
CASH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than DGRO's 1.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 2.19% | 2.53% | 4.37% | 5.05% | 2.30% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.94% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CASH.TO and DGRO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for CASH.TO.
CASH.TO is categorized as Money Market, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for CASH.TO and 0.08% for DGRO.
Find the right allocation for CASH.TO and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer