CAS vs. KJD
CAS (Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF) and KJD (KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF) are both China Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. CAS charges 0.88%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for KJD.
Performance
CAS vs. KJD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CAS
- 1D
- -3.09%
- 1M
- -7.28%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KJD
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- 7.71%
- 6M
- -2.89%
- YTD
- 1.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAS vs. KJD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF | -7.21% |
KJD KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF | -3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAS and KJD is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAS vs. KJD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS) and KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF (KJD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAS vs. KJD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAS drawdown since its inception was -10.52%, smaller than the maximum KJD drawdown of -50.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAS and KJD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAS | KJD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.52% | -50.81% | +40.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.52% | -32.25% | +21.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.57% | -30.34% | +26.77% |
Volatility
CAS vs. KJD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAS | KJD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.80% | 61.33% | -28.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.80% | 61.33% | -28.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.80% | 61.33% | -28.53% |
CAS vs. KJD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAS has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than KJD's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAS vs. KJD - Dividend Comparison
CAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, while KJD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF | 0.38% |
KJD KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAS and KJD have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CAS is cheaper at 0.88% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CAS is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KJD.
CAS has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for KJD.
They also come from different issuers: Simplify and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for CAS and 1.26% for KJD.
Find the right allocation for CAS and KJD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer