CAS vs. FXI
CAS (Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF) and FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF) are both China Equities funds. CAS is actively managed, while FXI is passively managed. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CAS charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FXI.
Performance
CAS vs. FXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CAS
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -11.07%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FXI
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 14.38%
- 6M
- -7.16%
- YTD
- -3.96%
- 1Y
- 0.93%
- 3Y*
- 9.88%
- 5Y*
- 0.26%
- 10Y*
- 2.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $38.47K | $52.48K | $79.55K | |
| $773.89M | $798.32M | $975.73M |
CAS vs. FXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF | -11.11% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 4.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAS and FXI is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.08 |
CAS vs. FXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CAS
FXI
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
CAS
FXI
Basic Materials
CAS
-
FXI
Communication Services
CAS
-
FXI
Consumer Cyclical
CAS
-
FXI
Consumer Defensive
CAS
-
FXI
Energy
CAS
-
FXI
Healthcare
CAS
-
FXI
Industrials
CAS
-
FXI
Real Estate
CAS
-
FXI
Technology
CAS
-
FXI
Utilities
CAS
-
FXI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAS vs. FXI — Risk / Return Rank
CAS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FXI
CAS vs. FXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAS | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.01 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.03 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.07 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAS vs. FXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAS drawdown since its inception was -15.89%, smaller than the maximum FXI drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAS and FXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAS | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.89% | -72.68% | +56.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -22.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -49.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.28% | -24.37% | +10.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -31.21% | +25.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.00% | — |
Volatility
CAS vs. FXI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAS | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.97% | 20.32% | +13.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.97% | 31.44% | +2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.97% | 27.60% | +6.37% |
CAS vs. FXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAS has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than FXI's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAS vs. FXI - Dividend Comparison
CAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than FXI's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF | 2.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 1.86% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAS and FXI have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FXI is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FXI is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for CAS.
CAS has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 1.86% for FXI.
They also come from different issuers: Simplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for CAS and 0.74% for FXI.
Find the right allocation for CAS and FXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer