CAS vs. DRAG
CAS (Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF) and DRAG (Roundhill China Dragons ETF) are both China Equities funds. Both are actively managed. CAS charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for DRAG.
Performance
CAS vs. DRAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CAS
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRAG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAS vs. DRAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF | -1.66% |
DRAG Roundhill China Dragons ETF | 0.00% |
CAS vs. DRAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CAS
DRAG
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
CAS
DRAG
-
Basic Materials
CAS
-
DRAG
-
Communication Services
CAS
-
DRAG
Consumer Cyclical
CAS
-
DRAG
Consumer Defensive
CAS
-
DRAG
-
Energy
CAS
-
DRAG
-
Healthcare
CAS
-
DRAG
-
Industrials
CAS
-
DRAG
-
Real Estate
CAS
-
DRAG
-
Technology
CAS
-
DRAG
Utilities
CAS
-
DRAG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAS vs. DRAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS) and Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAS | DRAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -3.61 | — | — |
Drawdowns
CAS vs. DRAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAS drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, which is greater than DRAG's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAS and DRAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAS | DRAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.59% | 0.00% | -2.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | 0.00% | -1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.72% | 0.00% | -1.72% |
Volatility
CAS vs. DRAG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAS | DRAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.83% | 0.00% | +20.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 0.00% | +20.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 0.00% | +20.83% |
CAS vs. DRAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAS has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than DRAG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAS vs. DRAG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CAS nor DRAG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, DRAG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRAG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for CAS.
CAS and DRAG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for CAS and 0.59% for DRAG.
Find the right allocation for CAS and DRAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer