PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAS vs. ARTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAS vs. ARTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS) and iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CAS

1D
-0.49%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARTY

1D
-0.90%
1M
26.10%
YTD
66.09%
6M
63.47%
1Y
112.42%
3Y*
36.54%
5Y*
14.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAS vs. ARTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CAS and ARTY is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.00

CAS vs. ARTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CAS
ARTY

Financial Services

43.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.6%

Industrials

-

5.3%

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Technology

-

87.7%

Utilities

-

1.7%

Financial Services

CAS
43.4%
ARTY

-

Basic Materials

CAS

-

ARTY

-

Communication Services

CAS

-

ARTY
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

CAS

-

ARTY

-

Consumer Defensive

CAS

-

ARTY

-

Energy

CAS

-

ARTY

-

Healthcare

CAS

-

ARTY
0.6%

Industrials

CAS

-

ARTY
5.3%

Real Estate

CAS

-

ARTY
1.2%

Technology

CAS

-

ARTY
87.7%

Utilities

CAS

-

ARTY
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAS vs. ARTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAS

ARTY
ARTY Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ARTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARTY Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ARTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARTY Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAS vs. ARTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS) and iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CAS vs. ARTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CASARTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-3.61

0.63

-4.24

Drawdowns

CAS vs. ARTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAS drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, smaller than the maximum ARTY drawdown of -54.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAS and ARTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CASARTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.59%

-54.50%

+51.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-0.90%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.72%

-19.85%

+18.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.40%

Volatility

CAS vs. ARTY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CASARTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.83%

29.94%

-9.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.83%

28.58%

-7.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.83%

27.75%

-6.92%

CAS vs. ARTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAS has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than ARTY's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAS vs. ARTY - Dividend Comparison

Neither CAS nor ARTY has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ARTY
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
0.00%0.00%0.50%0.88%0.75%2.41%0.53%0.69%0.34%
CAS
Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAS and ARTY have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ARTY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ARTY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for CAS.

CAS and ARTY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

CAS is categorized as China Equities, while ARTY is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for CAS and 0.47% for ARTY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAS and ARTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer