CARY vs. PULT
CARY (Angel Oak Income ETF) and PULT (Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CARY is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Angel Oak, while PULT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Putnam. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CARY returned 7.40%/yr vs 5.34%/yr for PULT. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CARY charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for PULT.
Performance
CARY vs. PULT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CARY achieves a 1.84% return, which is significantly higher than PULT's 1.19% return.
CARY
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 6.99%
- 3Y*
- 7.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PULT
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 4.18%
- 3Y*
- 5.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CARY vs. PULT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CARY Angel Oak Income ETF | 1.84% | 7.54% | 6.93% | 7.10% |
PULT Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF | 1.19% | 5.08% | 5.93% | 5.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between CARY and PULT is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2023 | 0.24 |
CARY vs. PULT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CARY
PULT
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
CARY
PULT
Financial Services
CARY
PULT
Communication Services
CARY
-
PULT
Consumer Cyclical
CARY
-
PULT
Consumer Defensive
CARY
-
PULT
-
Energy
CARY
-
PULT
Healthcare
CARY
-
PULT
Industrials
CARY
-
PULT
Real Estate
CARY
-
PULT
Technology
CARY
-
PULT
Utilities
CARY
-
PULT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CARY vs. PULT — Risk / Return Rank
CARY
PULT
CARY vs. PULT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) and Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF (PULT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CARY | PULT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.90 | 3.04 | -1.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.49 | 12.86 | -7.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.82 | 89.82 | -66.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CARY | PULT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.99 | 5.59 | -1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.65 | 8.33 | -5.68 |
Drawdowns
CARY vs. PULT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CARY drawdown since its inception was -1.96%, which is greater than PULT's maximum drawdown of -0.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARY and PULT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CARY | PULT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.96% | -0.34% | -1.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.28% | -0.33% | -0.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.96% | -0.33% | -1.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.33% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.32% | -0.02% | -0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.29% | 0.05% | +0.24% |
Volatility
CARY vs. PULT - Volatility Comparison
Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) has a higher volatility of 0.56% compared to Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF (PULT) at 0.52%. This indicates that CARY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PULT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CARY | PULT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.56% | 0.52% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.30% | 0.62% | +0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76% | 0.75% | +1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.73% | 0.63% | +2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.73% | 0.63% | +2.10% |
CARY vs. PULT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CARY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PULT's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
CARY vs. PULT - Dividend Comparison
CARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, more than PULT's 4.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARY Angel Oak Income ETF | 5.93% | 6.13% | 6.10% | 6.38% | 0.48% |
PULT Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF | 4.65% | 4.59% | 5.38% | 4.88% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CARY and PULT have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CARY has higher volatility (0.56%) compared to PULT (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARY dropped -1.96% vs PULT's -0.34%.
On 3-year performance, CARY leads with 7.40% vs 5.34% for PULT. On fees, PULT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CARY has performed better with a 7.40% return vs 5.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PULT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for CARY.
CARY has the higher dividend yield at 5.93%, compared with 4.65% for PULT.
CARY is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while PULT is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Angel Oak and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for CARY and 0.25% for PULT.
PULT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.59 vs 3.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CARY and PULT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer