CARU vs. XTAP
CARU (Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN) and XTAP (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CARU is passively managed, while XTAP is actively managed. Over the past year, CARU returned -15.14% vs 21.00% for XTAP. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CARU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTAP.
Performance
CARU vs. XTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CARU achieves a -23.03% return, which is significantly lower than XTAP's 10.96% return.
CARU
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 8.25%
- YTD
- -23.03%
- 6M
- -25.68%
- 1Y
- -15.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTAP
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 21.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- —
CARU vs. XTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CARU Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN | -23.03% | 7.29% | 23.44% | -12.17% |
XTAP Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF | 10.96% | 17.58% | 14.26% | 7.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between CARU and XTAP is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023 | 0.62 |
The correlation between CARU and XTAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CARU vs. XTAP — Risk / Return Rank
CARU
XTAP
CARU vs. XTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CARU | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 2.22 | -1.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | 14.82 | -15.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.63 | 78.70 | -79.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CARU | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 | 4.50 | -4.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.80 | -0.85 |
Drawdowns
CARU vs. XTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CARU drawdown since its inception was -66.44%, which is greater than XTAP's maximum drawdown of -22.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARU and XTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CARU | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.44% | -22.13% | -44.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.87% | -1.42% | -49.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.22% | -0.21% | -39.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.91% | -3.45% | -32.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.99% | 0.27% | +23.72% |
Volatility
CARU vs. XTAP - Volatility Comparison
Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) has a higher volatility of 22.70% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) at 1.10%. This indicates that CARU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CARU | XTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.70% | 1.10% | +21.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.26% | 3.16% | +47.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.70% | 4.70% | +64.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.27% | 14.54% | +65.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.27% | 14.41% | +65.86% |
CARU vs. XTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
CARU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
CARU vs. XTAP - Dividend Comparison
Neither CARU nor XTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CARU and XTAP have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CARU has higher volatility (22.70%) compared to XTAP (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARU dropped -66.44% vs XTAP's -22.13%.
On 1-year performance, XTAP leads with 21.00% vs -15.14% for CARU. On fees, XTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XTAP has performed better with a 21.00% return vs -15.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for CARU.
CARU and XTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Max and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CARU and 0.79% for XTAP.
XTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.50 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CARU and XTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer