CARU vs. GGLL

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CARU (Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN) and GGLL (Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - CARU tracks the Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%) while GGLL tracks the Alphabet Inc. Class A (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CARU returned -8.94%/yr vs 66.42%/yr for GGLL. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CARU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for GGLL.

Performance

CARU vs. GGLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARU achieves a -24.98% return, which is significantly lower than GGLL's 26.34% return.

CARU

• 1D: 3.40%
• 1M: -4.68%
• 6M: -23.35%
• YTD: -24.98%
• 1Y: -12.14%
• 3Y*: -8.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -3.46%

GGLL

• 1D: 9.78%
• 1M: 5.16%
• 6M: 5.79%
• YTD: 26.34%
• 1Y: 222.06%
• 3Y*: 66.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 53.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CARU Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN	$54.44K	$33.09K	$19.89K
GGLL Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares	$221.89M	$169.09M	$183.71M

CARU vs. GGLL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CARU Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN	-24.98%	7.29%	23.44%	-9.74%
GGLL Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares	26.34%	123.07%	48.88%	22.64%

Correlation

The correlation between CARU and GGLL is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023	0.37

Return for Risk

CARU vs. GGLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CARU

CARU Risk / Return Rank: 9
CARU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
CARU Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
CARU Omega Ratio Rank: 12
CARU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
CARU Martin Ratio Rank: 8

GGLL

GGLL Risk / Return Rank: 94
GGLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
GGLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
GGLL Omega Ratio Rank: 92
GGLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
GGLL Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CARU vs. GGLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CARU	GGLL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.17	3.45	-3.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.25	3.75	-3.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.46	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.24	5.54	-5.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.43	14.84	-15.27

CARU vs. GGLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARU Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the GGLL Sharpe Ratio of 3.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARU and GGLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CARU vs. GGLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARU drawdown since its inception was -66.44%, which is greater than GGLL's maximum drawdown of -52.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARU and GGLL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CARU	GGLL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.44%	-52.81%	-13.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.87%	-40.32%	-10.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-59.03%	-52.81%	-6.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.76%	-18.36%	-22.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.15%	-15.56%	-20.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.31%	15.03%	+13.28%

Volatility

CARU vs. GGLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) is 23.85%, while Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) has a volatility of 28.08%. This indicates that CARU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CARU	GGLL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.85%	28.08%	-4.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.89%	50.37%	+4.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.88%	64.87%	+7.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	80.17%	57.40%	+22.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	80.17%	57.40%	+22.77%

CARU vs. GGLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GGLL's 0.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

CARU vs. GGLL - Dividend Comparison

CARU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CARU Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GGLL Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares	3.90%	4.16%	3.29%	2.05%	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CARU and GGLL in my portfolio?

CARU and GGLL have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CARU or GGLL?

GGLL has higher volatility (28.08%) compared to CARU (23.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARU dropped -66.44% vs GGLL's -52.81%.

Which ETF is better, CARU or GGLL?

On 3-year performance, GGLL leads with 66.42% vs -8.94% for CARU. On fees, CARU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, CARU has been the lower-risk option at 23.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CARU or GGLL?

Over the 3-year period, GGLL has performed better with a 66.42% return vs -8.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CARU or GGLL?

CARU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for GGLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CARU or GGLL?

GGLL has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 0.00% for CARU.

What is the main difference between CARU and GGLL?

CARU tracks Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%), while GGLL tracks Alphabet Inc. Class A (200%). They also come from different issuers: Max and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CARU and 0.96% for GGLL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GGLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.