CARU vs. ERX
CARU (Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN) and ERX (Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - CARU tracks the Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%) while ERX tracks the Energy Select Sector Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CARU returned -22.74% vs 53.56% for ERX. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CARU charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for ERX.
Performance
CARU vs. ERX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CARU achieves a -32.53% return, which is significantly lower than ERX's 44.06% return.
CARU
- 1D
- -3.02%
- 1M
- -9.49%
- YTD
- -32.53%
- 6M
- -39.00%
- 1Y
- -22.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ERX
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -16.23%
- YTD
- 44.06%
- 6M
- 45.10%
- 1Y
- 53.56%
- 3Y*
- 19.85%
- 5Y*
- 25.26%
- 10Y*
- -10.18%
CARU vs. ERX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CARU Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN | -32.53% | 7.29% | 23.44% | -9.74% |
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 44.06% | 2.79% | 1.09% | 10.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between CARU and ERX is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023 | 0.20 |
The correlation between CARU and ERX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CARU vs. ERX — Risk / Return Rank
CARU
ERX
CARU vs. ERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CARU | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.22 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | 1.89 | -2.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | 5.50 | -6.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CARU vs. ERX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CARU drawdown since its inception was -66.44%, smaller than the maximum ERX drawdown of -99.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARU and ERX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CARU | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.44% | -99.54% | +33.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.87% | -28.49% | -22.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -98.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.72% | -92.73% | +46.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.96% | -67.09% | +31.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.49% | 9.77% | +15.72% |
Volatility
CARU vs. ERX - Volatility Comparison
Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN (CARU) has a higher volatility of 24.02% compared to Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) at 14.48%. This indicates that CARU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CARU | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.02% | 14.48% | +9.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.55% | 34.00% | +18.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.98% | 41.99% | +27.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.42% | 51.92% | +28.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.42% | 69.08% | +11.34% |
CARU vs. ERX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CARU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than ERX's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
CARU vs. ERX - Dividend Comparison
CARU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARU Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 1.86% | 2.54% | 2.94% | 3.17% | 2.23% | 2.16% | 2.35% | 1.56% | 3.10% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CARU and ERX have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CARU has higher volatility (24.02%) compared to ERX (14.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARU dropped -66.44% vs ERX's -99.54%.
On 1-year performance, ERX leads with 53.56% vs -22.74% for CARU. On fees, CARU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, ERX has been the lower-risk option at 14.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ERX has performed better with a 53.56% return vs -22.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CARU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for ERX.
ERX has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 0.00% for CARU.
CARU tracks Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%), while ERX tracks Energy Select Sector Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Max and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CARU and 1.09% for ERX.
ERX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CARU and ERX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer