CARR vs. BHP
CARR (Carrier Global Corporation) and BHP (BHP Group Limited) are both stocks. CARR operates in Building Products & Equipment (Industrials), while BHP operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, CARR returned 10.28%/yr vs 16.25%/yr for BHP. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CARR vs. BHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CARR achieves a 33.35% return, which is significantly lower than BHP's 53.40% return.
CARR
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 8.10%
- YTD
- 33.35%
- 6M
- 33.09%
- 1Y
- -0.12%
- 3Y*
- 16.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.28%
- 10Y*
- —
BHP
- 1D
- 3.20%
- 1M
- 7.61%
- YTD
- 53.40%
- 6M
- 55.28%
- 1Y
- 94.96%
- 3Y*
- 19.44%
- 5Y*
- 16.25%
- 10Y*
- 23.18%
CARR vs. BHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARR Carrier Global Corporation | 33.35% | -21.57% | 20.26% | 41.47% | -22.68% | 45.31% | 176.86% |
BHP BHP Group Limited | 53.40% | 28.91% | -24.64% | 16.50% | 44.34% | 0.91% | 75.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between CARR and BHP is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2020 | 0.32 |
Fundamentals
CARR:
$58.92B
BHP:
$231.09B
CARR:
$1.55
BHP:
$8.51
CARR:
45.24
BHP:
10.67
CARR:
0.67
BHP:
2.95
CARR:
2.73
BHP:
2.15
CARR:
4.27
BHP:
4.58
CARR:
$21.87B
BHP:
$107.64B
CARR:
$5.43B
BHP:
$89.04B
CARR:
$3.15B
BHP:
$52.23B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CARR vs. BHP — Risk / Return Rank
CARR
BHP
CARR vs. BHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carrier Global Corporation (CARR) and BHP Group Limited (BHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CARR | BHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.42 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | 4.57 | -4.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.08 | 16.96 | -17.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CARR vs. BHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CARR drawdown since its inception was -40.82%, smaller than the maximum BHP drawdown of -76.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARR and BHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CARR | BHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.82% | -76.22% | +35.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.38% | -19.80% | -17.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.91% | -37.21% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.82% | -37.21% | -3.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.13% | -2.50% | -10.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.21% | -21.28% | +7.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.10% | 5.38% | +18.72% |
Volatility
CARR vs. BHP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Carrier Global Corporation (CARR) is 12.13%, while BHP Group Limited (BHP) has a volatility of 13.72%. This indicates that CARR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CARR | BHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.13% | 13.72% | -1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.68% | 26.69% | +0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.29% | 32.39% | +2.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.90% | 32.44% | -0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.83% | 32.34% | +2.49% |
Dividends
CARR vs. BHP - Dividend Comparison
CARR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than BHP's 2.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BHP BHP Group Limited | 2.93% | 3.64% | 5.98% | 4.98% | 22.44% | 9.98% | 3.67% | 8.59% | 4.89% | 3.61% | 1.68% | 9.38% |
CARR Carrier Global Corporation | 1.65% | 1.70% | 1.16% | 1.30% | 1.54% | 0.94% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CARR vs. BHP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carrier Global Corporation and BHP Group Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CARR vs. BHP - Profitability Comparison
CARR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carrier Global Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.24B and revenue of 5.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.3%.
BHP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BHP Group Limited reported a gross profit of 11.98B and revenue of 27.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.9%.
CARR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carrier Global Corporation reported an operating income of 259.00M and revenue of 5.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.
BHP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BHP Group Limited reported an operating income of 11.98B and revenue of 27.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.9%.
CARR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carrier Global Corporation reported a net income of 238.00M and revenue of 5.34B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.
BHP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BHP Group Limited reported a net income of 5.65B and revenue of 27.95B, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CARR and BHP have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BHP has higher volatility (13.72%) compared to CARR (12.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARR dropped -40.82% vs BHP's -76.22%.
BHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CARR and BHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer