CARK vs. SGRT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CARK (Castleark Large Growth ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CARK charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.

Performance

CARK vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Castleark Large Growth ETF (CARK) and SMART Earnings Growth ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARK achieves a 5.67% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 25.07% return.

CARK

• 1D: 1.55%
• 1M: -0.09%
• 6M: 5.72%
• YTD: 5.67%
• 1Y: 13.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.79%

SGRT

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -7.04%
• 6M: 20.49%
• YTD: 25.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CARK Castleark Large Growth ETF	$10.97K	$11.97K	$43.16K
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth ETF	$998.46K	$1.36M	$2.23M

CARK vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CARK Castleark Large Growth ETF	5.67%	5.27%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth ETF	25.07%	26.83%

Correlation

The correlation between CARK and SGRT is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025	0.70

Return for Risk

CARK vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CARK

CARK Risk / Return Rank: 25
CARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
CARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
CARK Omega Ratio Rank: 24
CARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
CARK Martin Ratio Rank: 26

SGRT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CARK vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Castleark Large Growth ETF (CARK) and SMART Earnings Growth ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CARK	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.59	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.92	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.66	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.11	—	—

Drawdowns

CARK vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARK drawdown since its inception was -25.22%, roughly equal to the maximum SGRT drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARK and SGRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CARK	SGRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.22%	-24.98%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.00%	-18.61%	+14.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.41%	-4.25%	-0.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.18%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CARK	SGRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.49%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.52%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.48%	38.93%	-20.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.75%	38.93%	-18.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.75%	38.93%	-18.18%

CARK vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARK has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

CARK vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

CARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than SGRT's 0.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CARK Castleark Large Growth ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.02%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth ETF	0.13%	0.16%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CARK and SGRT in my portfolio?

CARK and SGRT have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CARK or SGRT?

On fees, CARK is cheaper at 0.54% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CARK or SGRT?

CARK is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CARK or SGRT?

SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.01% for CARK.

What is the main difference between CARK and SGRT?

Their fees differ too: 0.54% for CARK and 0.59% for SGRT.