CARK vs. SGRT
CARK (Castleark Large Growth ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CARK charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.
Performance
CARK vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CARK achieves a 8.34% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 51.46% return.
CARK
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 8.34%
- 6M
- 8.76%
- 1Y
- 22.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGRT
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 14.68%
- YTD
- 51.46%
- 6M
- 56.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CARK vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CARK Castleark Large Growth ETF | 8.34% | 5.54% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 51.46% | 25.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between CARK and SGRT is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CARK vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank
CARK
SGRT
CARK vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Castleark Large Growth ETF (CARK) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CARK | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.59 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CARK | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 3.81 | -2.83 |
Drawdowns
CARK vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CARK drawdown since its inception was -25.22%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARK and SGRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CARK | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.22% | -17.87% | -7.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.58% | 0.00% | -1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.44% | -3.11% | -1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.87% | — | — |
Volatility
CARK vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CARK | SGRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.92% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.94% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.06% | 33.41% | -16.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 33.41% | -12.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 33.41% | -12.71% |
CARK vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CARK has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
CARK vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison
CARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than SGRT's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CARK Castleark Large Growth ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.02% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CARK and SGRT have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CARK is cheaper at 0.54% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CARK is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.
SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.01% for CARK.
Their fees differ too: 0.54% for CARK and 0.59% for SGRT.
Find the right allocation for CARK and SGRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer