CARK vs. BIBL

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CARK (Castleark Large Growth ETF) and BIBL (Inspire 100 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. CARK is actively managed, while BIBL is passively managed. Over the past year, CARK returned 13.40% vs 31.70% for BIBL. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CARK charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BIBL.

Performance

CARK vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Castleark Large Growth ETF (CARK) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARK achieves a 5.67% return, which is significantly lower than BIBL's 21.43% return.

CARK

• 1D: 1.55%
• 1M: -0.09%
• 6M: 5.72%
• YTD: 5.67%
• 1Y: 13.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.79%

BIBL

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: -2.31%
• 6M: 14.67%
• YTD: 21.43%
• 1Y: 31.70%
• 3Y*: 18.28%
• 5Y*: 9.07%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	$2.49M	$2.79M	$2.92M
CARK Castleark Large Growth ETF	$10.97K	$11.97K	$43.16K

CARK vs. BIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CARK Castleark Large Growth ETF	5.67%	10.84%	26.49%	4.12%
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	21.43%	17.27%	12.49%	6.97%

Correlation

The correlation between CARK and BIBL is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023	0.69

The correlation between CARK and BIBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

CARK vs. BIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CARK	BIBL
Technology	52.4%	33.0%
Communication Services	12.8%	-
Financial Services	10.5%	8.3%
Healthcare	8.7%	4.4%
Consumer Cyclical	6.9%	0.3%
Industrials	3.7%	26.8%
Utilities	2.5%	3.4%
Basic Materials	-	3.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.4%
Energy	-	5.4%
Real Estate	-	14.2%

Return for Risk

CARK vs. BIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CARK

CARK Risk / Return Rank: 25
CARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
CARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
CARK Omega Ratio Rank: 24
CARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
CARK Martin Ratio Rank: 26

BIBL

BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 79
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 72
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CARK vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Castleark Large Growth ETF (CARK) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CARK	BIBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.59	1.73	-1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.92	2.37	-1.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.30	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.66	3.38	-2.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.11	12.27	-10.16

CARK vs. BIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARK Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the BIBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARK and BIBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CARK vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARK drawdown since its inception was -25.22%, smaller than the maximum BIBL drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARK and BIBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CARK	BIBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.22%	-36.12%	+10.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.50%	-8.94%	-7.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.60%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.00%	-5.89%	+1.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.41%	-6.96%	+2.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.18%	2.46%	+2.72%

Volatility

CARK vs. BIBL - Volatility Comparison

Castleark Large Growth ETF (CARK) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) at 5.03%. This indicates that CARK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CARK	BIBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.49%	5.03%	+0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.52%	14.49%	+0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.48%	17.45%	+1.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.75%	19.91%	+0.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.75%	21.10%	-0.35%

CARK vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARK has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

CARK vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison

CARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than BIBL's 0.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	0.95%	1.01%	0.92%	1.02%	0.98%	17.87%	1.67%	1.30%	1.49%	0.31%
CARK Castleark Large Growth ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CARK and BIBL in my portfolio?

CARK and BIBL have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CARK or BIBL?

CARK has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to BIBL (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARK dropped -25.22% vs BIBL's -36.12%.

Which ETF is better, CARK or BIBL?

On 1-year performance, BIBL leads with 31.70% vs 13.40% for CARK. On fees, BIBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BIBL has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CARK or BIBL?

Over the 1-year period, BIBL has performed better with a 31.70% return vs 13.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CARK or BIBL?

BIBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for CARK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CARK or BIBL?

BIBL has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.01% for CARK.

What is the main difference between CARK and BIBL?

They also come from different issuers: CastleArk and Inspire. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for CARK and 0.35% for BIBL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.