PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAPE vs. VXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAPE vs. VXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN (VXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAPE achieves a -1.70% return, which is significantly higher than VXX's -8.16% return.


CAPE

1D
-0.48%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
-1.70%
6M
-1.38%
1Y
3.29%
3Y*
12.19%
5Y*
10Y*

VXX

1D
-0.25%
1M
-15.21%
YTD
-8.16%
6M
-22.63%
1Y
-53.35%
3Y*
-42.02%
5Y*
-46.10%
10Y*
-46.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAPE vs. VXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CAPE
iPath Shiller CAPE ETN
-1.70%9.10%14.40%27.65%-15.28%
VXX
iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN
-8.16%-42.21%-26.22%-72.52%-42.20%

Correlation

The correlation between CAPE and VXX is -0.53, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022

-0.61

The correlation between CAPE and VXX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.61 to -0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAPE vs. VXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAPE
CAPE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
CAPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAPE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CAPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAPE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

VXX
VXX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
VXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
VXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAPE vs. VXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN (VXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAPEVXXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

0.82

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

-0.95

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.24

-1.34

+2.58

CAPE vs. VXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAPE Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is higher than the VXX Sharpe Ratio of -0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAPE and VXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAPEVXXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

-0.96

+1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

-0.77

+1.18

Drawdowns

CAPE vs. VXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAPE drawdown since its inception was -22.07%, smaller than the maximum VXX drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAPE and VXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAPEVXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.07%

-100.00%

+77.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-56.23%

+46.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.32%

-80.28%

+65.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.83%

-100.00%

+95.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-95.08%

+90.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

39.88%

-37.23%

Volatility

CAPE vs. VXX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) is 2.63%, while iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN (VXX) has a volatility of 8.29%. This indicates that CAPE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAPEVXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

8.29%

-5.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.04%

40.88%

-32.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.89%

55.57%

-44.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.93%

67.96%

-51.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.93%

70.96%

-54.03%

CAPE vs. VXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAPE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than VXX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAPE vs. VXX - Dividend Comparison

CAPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, while VXX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CAPE
iPath Shiller CAPE ETN
1.41%1.39%1.23%1.01%0.80%
VXX
iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAPE and VXX have a correlation of -0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VXX has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to CAPE (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAPE dropped -22.07% vs VXX's -100.00%.

On 3-year performance, CAPE leads with 12.19% vs -42.02% for VXX. On fees, CAPE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CAPE has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CAPE has performed better with a 12.19% return vs -42.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CAPE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for VXX.

CAPE has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 0.00% for VXX.

CAPE is categorized as Global Equities, while VXX is Volatility. CAPE tracks Shiller Barclays CAPE US Core Sector Index, while VXX tracks S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures Index Total Return. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CAPE and 0.89% for VXX.

CAPE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAPE and VXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer