CAPE vs. VTV
CAPE (iPath Shiller CAPE ETN) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAPE is a Global Equities fund tracking the Shiller Barclays CAPE US Core Sector Index, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CAPE returned 12.19%/yr vs 18.28%/yr for VTV. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CAPE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.
Performance
CAPE vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAPE achieves a -1.70% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 12.30% return.
CAPE
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- -1.70%
- 6M
- -1.38%
- 1Y
- 3.29%
- 3Y*
- 12.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 12.30%
- 6M
- 13.12%
- 1Y
- 26.25%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 11.24%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
CAPE vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAPE iPath Shiller CAPE ETN | -1.70% | 9.10% | 14.40% | 27.65% | -15.28% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 12.30% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -3.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAPE and VTV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022 | 0.82 |
The correlation between CAPE and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
CAPE vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CAPE
VTV
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Technology
Industrials
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
CAPE
VTV
Communication Services
CAPE
VTV
Healthcare
CAPE
VTV
Consumer Cyclical
CAPE
VTV
Real Estate
CAPE
VTV
Financial Services
CAPE
VTV
Basic Materials
CAPE
VTV
Technology
CAPE
VTV
Industrials
CAPE
VTV
Energy
CAPE
-
VTV
Utilities
CAPE
-
VTV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAPE vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
CAPE
VTV
CAPE vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CAPE | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.47 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 4.15 | -3.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.24 | 15.69 | -14.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAPE | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 2.61 | -2.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.51 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
CAPE vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAPE drawdown since its inception was -22.07%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAPE and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAPE | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.07% | -59.27% | +37.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -6.35% | -3.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.32% | -14.52% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.83% | 0.00% | -4.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -7.87% | +2.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 1.68% | +0.97% |
Volatility
CAPE vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) have volatilities of 2.63% and 2.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAPE | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 2.52% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.04% | 7.55% | +0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.89% | 10.11% | +0.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 13.88% | +3.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 16.67% | +0.26% |
CAPE vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAPE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAPE vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
CAPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than VTV's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAPE iPath Shiller CAPE ETN | 1.41% | 1.39% | 1.23% | 1.01% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.86% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAPE and VTV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAPE has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to VTV (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAPE dropped -22.07% vs VTV's -59.27%.
On 3-year performance, VTV leads with 18.28% vs 12.19% for CAPE. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VTV has performed better with a 18.28% return vs 12.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CAPE.
VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.41% for CAPE.
CAPE is categorized as Global Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. CAPE tracks Shiller Barclays CAPE US Core Sector Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Barclays Capital and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CAPE and 0.04% for VTV.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAPE and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer