CAPE vs. PTLC
CAPE (iPath Shiller CAPE ETN) and PTLC (Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAPE is a Global Equities fund tracking the Shiller Barclays CAPE US Core Sector Index, while PTLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CAPE returned 12.19%/yr vs 14.93%/yr for PTLC. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CAPE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PTLC.
Performance
CAPE vs. PTLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAPE achieves a -1.70% return, which is significantly lower than PTLC's 5.53% return.
CAPE
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- -1.70%
- 6M
- -1.38%
- 1Y
- 3.29%
- 3Y*
- 12.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTLC
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 5.53%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- 21.41%
- 3Y*
- 14.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.26%
CAPE vs. PTLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAPE iPath Shiller CAPE ETN | -1.70% | 9.10% | 14.40% | 27.65% | -15.28% |
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 5.53% | 5.10% | 24.31% | 16.78% | -3.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAPE and PTLC is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022 | 0.60 |
The correlation between CAPE and PTLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.70 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CAPE vs. PTLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CAPE
PTLC
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Technology
Industrials
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
CAPE
PTLC
Communication Services
CAPE
PTLC
Healthcare
CAPE
PTLC
Consumer Cyclical
CAPE
PTLC
Real Estate
CAPE
PTLC
Financial Services
CAPE
PTLC
Basic Materials
CAPE
PTLC
Technology
CAPE
PTLC
Industrials
CAPE
PTLC
Energy
CAPE
-
PTLC
Utilities
CAPE
-
PTLC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAPE vs. PTLC — Risk / Return Rank
CAPE
PTLC
CAPE vs. PTLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CAPE | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.34 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 2.45 | -2.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.24 | 9.71 | -8.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAPE | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 1.91 | -1.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.70 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
CAPE vs. PTLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAPE drawdown since its inception was -22.07%, smaller than the maximum PTLC drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAPE and PTLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAPE | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.07% | -26.63% | +4.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -8.77% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.32% | -15.17% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.83% | -0.74% | -4.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -5.64% | +0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 2.21% | +0.44% |
Volatility
CAPE vs. PTLC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) is 2.63%, while Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that CAPE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAPE | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 2.88% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.04% | 8.15% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.89% | 11.27% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 11.73% | +5.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 13.17% | +3.76% |
CAPE vs. PTLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAPE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PTLC's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAPE vs. PTLC - Dividend Comparison
CAPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, more than PTLC's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAPE iPath Shiller CAPE ETN | 1.41% | 1.39% | 1.23% | 1.01% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.06% | 0.67% | 1.18% | 1.26% | 0.73% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 1.00% | 0.97% | 1.08% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAPE and PTLC have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTLC has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to CAPE (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAPE dropped -22.07% vs PTLC's -26.63%.
On 3-year performance, PTLC leads with 14.93% vs 12.19% for CAPE. On fees, CAPE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CAPE has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PTLC has performed better with a 14.93% return vs 12.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CAPE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTLC.
CAPE has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 1.01% for PTLC.
CAPE is categorized as Global Equities, while PTLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. CAPE tracks Shiller Barclays CAPE US Core Sector Index, while PTLC tracks Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Barclays Capital and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CAPE and 0.60% for PTLC.
PTLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAPE and PTLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer