CAPE vs. FIXT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT).

CAPE and FIXT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CAPE is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the Shiller Barclays CAPE US Core Sector Index. It was launched on Oct 10, 2012. FIXT is a passively managed fund by Procure that tracks the performance of the VettaFi Natural Disaster Response and Mitigation Index. It was launched on May 31, 2022. Both CAPE and FIXT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CAPE vs. FIXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CAPE vs. FIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CAPE iPath Shiller CAPE ETN	-4.29%	4.26%
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF	0.06%	4.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAPE achieves a -4.29% return, which is significantly lower than FIXT's 0.06% return.

CAPE

• 1D: 2.22%
• 1M: -7.33%
• YTD: -4.29%
• 6M: -4.53%
• 1Y: 2.96%
• 3Y*: 12.22%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FIXT

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -2.05%
• YTD: 0.06%
• 6M: 1.05%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAPE vs. FIXT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAPE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FIXT's 0.75% expense ratio.

FIXT

Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF

CAPE

iPath Shiller CAPE ETN

Return for Risk

CAPE vs. FIXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAPE

CAPE Risk / Return Rank: 19
CAPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
CAPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
CAPE Omega Ratio Rank: 17
CAPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
CAPE Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAPE vs. FIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Shiller CAPE ETN (CAPE) and Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CAPE	FIXT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.20	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.40	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.37	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.50	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CAPE	FIXT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	1.56	-1.17

Correlation

The correlation between CAPE and FIXT is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CAPE vs. FIXT - Dividend Comparison

CAPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than FIXT's 4.22% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CAPE iPath Shiller CAPE ETN	1.46%	1.39%	1.23%	1.01%	0.80%
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF	4.22%	3.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CAPE vs. FIXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAPE drawdown since its inception was -22.07%, which is greater than FIXT's maximum drawdown of -2.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAPE and FIXT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAPE	FIXT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.07%	-2.79%	-19.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.33%	-2.05%	-5.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.00%	-0.47%	-4.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.71%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CAPE	FIXT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.09%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.01%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.07%	3.82%	+11.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.14%	3.82%	+13.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.14%	3.82%	+13.32%