PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAOS vs. HOLA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAOS vs. HOLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) and JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAOS achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly lower than HOLA's 3.91% return.


CAOS

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
0.82%
6M
0.69%
1Y
1.88%
3Y*
4.26%
5Y*
10Y*

HOLA

1D
-0.22%
1M
1.62%
YTD
3.91%
6M
5.59%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAOS vs. HOLA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CAOS and HOLA is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

-0.20

CAOS vs. HOLA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CAOS
HOLA

Technology

33.1%
11.9%

Financial Services

12.4%
23.9%

Communication Services

10.4%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
6.2%

Healthcare

9.6%
9.5%

Industrials

8.5%
15.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
6.5%

Energy

4.1%
2.6%

Utilities

2.6%
2.7%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.0%

Basic Materials

1.9%
5.2%

Technology

CAOS
33.1%
HOLA
11.9%

Financial Services

CAOS
12.4%
HOLA
23.9%

Communication Services

CAOS
10.4%
HOLA
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

CAOS
10.0%
HOLA
6.2%

Healthcare

CAOS
9.6%
HOLA
9.5%

Industrials

CAOS
8.5%
HOLA
15.5%

Consumer Defensive

CAOS
5.4%
HOLA
6.5%

Energy

CAOS
4.1%
HOLA
2.6%

Utilities

CAOS
2.6%
HOLA
2.7%

Real Estate

CAOS
2.0%
HOLA
1.0%

Basic Materials

CAOS
1.9%
HOLA
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAOS vs. HOLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAOS
CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

HOLA
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAOS vs. HOLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) and JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAOSHOLADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.22

CAOS vs. HOLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAOSHOLADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

1.40

-0.19

Drawdowns

CAOS vs. HOLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAOS drawdown since its inception was -3.60%, smaller than the maximum HOLA drawdown of -6.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAOS and HOLA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAOSHOLADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.60%

-6.99%

+3.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-1.91%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.90%

-1.45%

+0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

Volatility

CAOS vs. HOLA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAOSHOLADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52%

9.50%

-7.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.26%

9.50%

-5.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.26%

9.50%

-5.24%

CAOS vs. HOLA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAOS has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than HOLA's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAOS vs. HOLA - Dividend Comparison

CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HOLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CAOS and HOLA have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HOLA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HOLA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CAOS.

HOLA has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.

CAOS is categorized as Options Trading, while HOLA is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for CAOS and 0.50% for HOLA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAOS and HOLA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer