CAOS vs. HOLA
CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) and HOLA (JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAOS is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while HOLA is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. CAOS charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HOLA.
Performance
CAOS vs. HOLA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAOS achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly lower than HOLA's 3.91% return.
CAOS
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 1.88%
- 3Y*
- 4.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOLA
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 3.91%
- 6M
- 5.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAOS vs. HOLA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.82% | 1.03% |
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 3.91% | 7.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAOS and HOLA is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | -0.20 |
CAOS vs. HOLA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CAOS
HOLA
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
CAOS
HOLA
Financial Services
CAOS
HOLA
Communication Services
CAOS
HOLA
Consumer Cyclical
CAOS
HOLA
Healthcare
CAOS
HOLA
Industrials
CAOS
HOLA
Consumer Defensive
CAOS
HOLA
Energy
CAOS
HOLA
Utilities
CAOS
HOLA
Real Estate
CAOS
HOLA
Basic Materials
CAOS
HOLA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAOS vs. HOLA — Risk / Return Rank
CAOS
HOLA
CAOS vs. HOLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) and JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CAOS | HOLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.22 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAOS | HOLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 1.40 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
CAOS vs. HOLA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAOS drawdown since its inception was -3.60%, smaller than the maximum HOLA drawdown of -6.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAOS and HOLA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAOS | HOLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.60% | -6.99% | +3.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -1.91% | +0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.90% | -1.45% | +0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.30% | — | — |
Volatility
CAOS vs. HOLA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAOS | HOLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.26% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52% | 9.50% | -7.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.26% | 9.50% | -5.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.26% | 9.50% | -5.24% |
CAOS vs. HOLA - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAOS has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than HOLA's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAOS vs. HOLA - Dividend Comparison
CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HOLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 2.91% | 3.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAOS and HOLA have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HOLA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HOLA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CAOS.
HOLA has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.
CAOS is categorized as Options Trading, while HOLA is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for CAOS and 0.50% for HOLA.
Find the right allocation for CAOS and HOLA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer