HOLA vs. TRIO

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

HOLA (JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) and TRIO (MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HOLA returned 14.43% vs 12.74% for TRIO. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HOLA charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for TRIO.

Performance

HOLA vs. TRIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF (TRIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HOLA achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than TRIO's 6.45% return.

HOLA

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 0.31%
• 6M: 3.12%
• YTD: 5.81%
• 1Y: 14.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TRIO

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.57%
• 6M: 5.16%
• YTD: 6.45%
• 1Y: 12.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HOLA vs. TRIO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	5.81%	7.60%
TRIO MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF	6.45%	5.86%

Correlation

The correlation between HOLA and TRIO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025	0.75

The correlation between HOLA and TRIO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HOLA vs. TRIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOLA

HOLA Risk / Return Rank: 52
HOLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
HOLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
HOLA Omega Ratio Rank: 50
HOLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
HOLA Martin Ratio Rank: 51

TRIO

TRIO Risk / Return Rank: 81
TRIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
TRIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
TRIO Omega Ratio Rank: 84
TRIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
TRIO Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HOLA vs. TRIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) and MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF (TRIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HOLA	TRIO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	2.06	-0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	3.01	-0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.40	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	2.86	-0.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.91	14.21	-7.30

HOLA vs. TRIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HOLA Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the TRIO Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HOLA and TRIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HOLA vs. TRIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HOLA drawdown since its inception was -6.99%, smaller than the maximum TRIO drawdown of -9.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HOLA and TRIO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HOLA	TRIO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.99%	-9.88%	+2.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.99%	-4.47%	-2.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.05%	-0.16%	-0.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.41%	-0.75%	-0.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	0.90%	+1.19%

Volatility

HOLA vs. TRIO - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF (TRIO) at 1.64%. This indicates that HOLA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HOLA	TRIO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.91%	1.64%	+2.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.05%	5.05%	+3.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.92%	6.21%	+3.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.93%	10.38%	-0.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.93%	10.38%	-0.45%

HOLA vs. TRIO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HOLA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TRIO's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

HOLA vs. TRIO - Dividend Comparison

HOLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than TRIO's 8.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
HOLA JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	2.85%	3.02%
TRIO MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF	8.46%	9.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HOLA and TRIO in my portfolio?

HOLA and TRIO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HOLA or TRIO?

HOLA has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to TRIO (1.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HOLA dropped -6.99% vs TRIO's -9.88%.

Which ETF is better, HOLA or TRIO?

On 1-year performance, HOLA leads with 14.43% vs 12.74% for TRIO. On fees, HOLA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TRIO has been the lower-risk option at 1.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HOLA or TRIO?

Over the 1-year period, HOLA has performed better with a 14.43% return vs 12.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HOLA or TRIO?

HOLA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for TRIO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HOLA or TRIO?

TRIO has the higher dividend yield at 8.46%, compared with 2.85% for HOLA.

What is the main difference between HOLA and TRIO?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and ETF Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HOLA and 0.70% for TRIO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.