PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAOS vs. BTAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CAOS vs. BTAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) and AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CAOS vs. BTAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
1.10%2.55%5.33%7.97%
BTAL
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund
-2.99%-20.17%12.83%-7.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAOS achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly higher than BTAL's -2.99% return.


CAOS

1D
0.07%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.37%
1Y
3.19%
3Y*
5.46%
5Y*
10Y*

BTAL

1D
-2.72%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
-2.99%
6M
-10.10%
1Y
-31.33%
3Y*
-8.29%
5Y*
-1.50%
10Y*
-3.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CAOS vs. BTAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAOS has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than BTAL's 2.11% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CAOS vs. BTAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAOS
CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

BTAL
BTAL Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BTAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTAL Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
BTAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTAL Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAOS vs. BTAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) and AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAOSBTALDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.69

-1.40

+2.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.97

-2.13

+3.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.77

+0.48

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

-0.88

+1.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.38

-1.20

+2.57

CAOS vs. BTAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAOS Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is higher than the BTAL Sharpe Ratio of -1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAOS and BTAL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAOSBTALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

-1.40

+2.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

-0.17

+1.44

Correlation

The correlation between CAOS and BTAL is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CAOS vs. BTAL - Dividend Comparison

CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BTAL
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund
2.56%2.49%3.49%6.14%1.01%0.00%0.00%0.88%0.39%

Drawdowns

CAOS vs. BTAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAOS drawdown since its inception was -3.60%, smaller than the maximum BTAL drawdown of -41.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAOS and BTAL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CAOSBTALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.60%

-41.01%

+37.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.60%

-34.94%

+31.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-39.53%

+38.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.90%

-21.67%

+20.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

25.64%

-23.46%

Volatility

CAOS vs. BTAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) is 0.74%, while AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) has a volatility of 6.87%. This indicates that CAOS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CAOSBTALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

6.87%

-6.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.30%

15.84%

-14.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.68%

22.51%

-17.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.37%

18.36%

-13.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.37%

17.04%

-12.67%