PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CANC vs. SURI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CANC vs. SURI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema Oncology ETF (CANC) and Simplify Propel Opportunities ETF (SURI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CANC having a 16.66% return and SURI slightly lower at 16.44%.


CANC

1D
-0.97%
1M
8.94%
6M
10.55%
YTD
16.66%
1Y
54.48%
3Y*
108.39%
5Y*
10Y*

SURI

1D
-0.72%
1M
7.56%
6M
12.15%
YTD
16.44%
1Y
36.62%
3Y*
9.06%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CANC vs. SURI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CANC
Tema Oncology ETF
16.66%42.92%-5.37%367.55%
SURI
Simplify Propel Opportunities ETF
16.44%28.32%-13.34%-2.87%

Correlation

The correlation between CANC and SURI is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2023

0.52

The correlation between CANC and SURI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

CANC vs. SURI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CANC
SURI

Healthcare

100.0%
56.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

43.5%

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

CANC
100.0%
SURI
56.5%

Basic Materials

CANC

-

SURI

-

Communication Services

CANC

-

SURI

-

Consumer Cyclical

CANC

-

SURI

-

Consumer Defensive

CANC

-

SURI

-

Energy

CANC

-

SURI
43.5%

Financial Services

CANC

-

SURI

-

Industrials

CANC

-

SURI

-

Real Estate

CANC

-

SURI

-

Technology

CANC

-

SURI

-

Utilities

CANC

-

SURI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CANC vs. SURI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CANC
CANC Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CANC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CANC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CANC Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CANC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CANC Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

SURI
SURI Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SURI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SURI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SURI Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SURI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SURI Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CANC vs. SURI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Oncology ETF (CANC) and Simplify Propel Opportunities ETF (SURI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CANCSURIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.28

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.89

3.12

+2.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.89

8.25

+7.64

CANC vs. SURI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CANC Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the SURI Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CANC and SURI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CANC vs. SURI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CANC drawdown since its inception was -97.53%, which is greater than SURI's maximum drawdown of -47.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CANC and SURI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CANCSURIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.53%

-47.76%

-49.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.30%

-11.78%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.27%

-47.76%

+17.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.64%

-9.42%

-42.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-72.65%

-17.19%

-55.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

4.45%

-1.01%

Volatility

CANC vs. SURI - Volatility Comparison

Tema Oncology ETF (CANC) has a higher volatility of 6.45% compared to Simplify Propel Opportunities ETF (SURI) at 5.85%. This indicates that CANC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SURI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CANCSURIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.45%

5.85%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.40%

14.78%

+1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.74%

22.45%

+0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

276.80%

28.05%

+248.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

276.80%

28.05%

+248.75%

CANC vs. SURI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CANC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SURI's 2.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

CANC vs. SURI - Dividend Comparison

CANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than SURI's 15.22% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CANC
Tema Oncology ETF
0.05%0.06%3.00%0.56%
SURI
Simplify Propel Opportunities ETF
15.22%16.31%21.41%14.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


CANC and SURI have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CANC has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to SURI (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CANC dropped -97.53% vs SURI's -47.76%.

On 3-year performance, CANC leads with 108.39% vs 9.06% for SURI. On fees, CANC is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SURI has been the lower-risk option at 5.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CANC has performed better with a 108.39% return vs 9.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CANC is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 2.51% for SURI.

SURI has the higher dividend yield at 15.22%, compared with 0.05% for CANC.

They also come from different issuers: Tema and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CANC and 2.51% for SURI.

CANC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CANC and SURI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer