CANC vs. SURI
CANC (Tema Oncology ETF) and SURI (Simplify Propel Opportunities ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CANC returned 107.76%/yr vs 6.93%/yr for SURI. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CANC charges 0.75%/yr vs 2.51%/yr for SURI.
Performance
CANC vs. SURI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CANC achieves a 4.82% return, which is significantly lower than SURI's 6.10% return.
CANC
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -3.73%
- YTD
- 4.82%
- 6M
- 3.86%
- 1Y
- 47.37%
- 3Y*
- 107.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SURI
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -2.84%
- YTD
- 6.10%
- 6M
- 3.98%
- 1Y
- 32.89%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CANC vs. SURI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CANC Tema Oncology ETF | 4.82% | 42.92% | -5.37% | 366.40% |
SURI Simplify Propel Opportunities ETF | 6.10% | 28.32% | -13.34% | -2.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between CANC and SURI is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2023 | 0.52 |
The correlation between CANC and SURI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
CANC vs. SURI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CANC
SURI
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
CANC
SURI
Basic Materials
CANC
-
SURI
-
Communication Services
CANC
-
SURI
-
Consumer Cyclical
CANC
-
SURI
-
Consumer Defensive
CANC
-
SURI
-
Energy
CANC
-
SURI
Financial Services
CANC
-
SURI
-
Industrials
CANC
-
SURI
-
Real Estate
CANC
-
SURI
-
Technology
CANC
-
SURI
-
Utilities
CANC
-
SURI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CANC vs. SURI — Risk / Return Rank
CANC
SURI
CANC vs. SURI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Oncology ETF (CANC) and Simplify Propel Opportunities ETF (SURI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CANC | SURI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.26 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.49 | 2.81 | +2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.62 | 7.91 | +6.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CANC | SURI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 1.46 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 0.15 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
CANC vs. SURI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CANC drawdown since its inception was -97.53%, which is greater than SURI's maximum drawdown of -47.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CANC and SURI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CANC | SURI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.53% | -47.76% | -49.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.67% | -11.78% | +3.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.27% | -47.76% | +17.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.55% | -17.46% | -39.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.19% | -17.37% | -55.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 4.17% | -0.92% |
Volatility
CANC vs. SURI - Volatility Comparison
Tema Oncology ETF (CANC) has a higher volatility of 6.26% compared to Simplify Propel Opportunities ETF (SURI) at 5.89%. This indicates that CANC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SURI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CANC | SURI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.26% | 5.89% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.69% | 14.29% | +2.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.11% | 22.79% | +0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 280.27% | 28.27% | +252.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 280.27% | 28.27% | +252.00% |
CANC vs. SURI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CANC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SURI's 2.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
CANC vs. SURI - Dividend Comparison
CANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than SURI's 16.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CANC Tema Oncology ETF | 0.05% | 0.06% | 3.00% | 0.56% |
SURI Simplify Propel Opportunities ETF | 16.04% | 16.31% | 21.41% | 14.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CANC and SURI have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CANC has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to SURI (5.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CANC dropped -97.53% vs SURI's -47.76%.
On 3-year performance, CANC leads with 107.76% vs 6.93% for SURI. On fees, CANC is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SURI has been the lower-risk option at 5.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CANC has performed better with a 107.76% return vs 6.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CANC is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 2.51% for SURI.
SURI has the higher dividend yield at 16.04%, compared with 0.05% for CANC.
They also come from different issuers: Tema and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CANC and 2.51% for SURI.
CANC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CANC and SURI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer