CANC vs. ARMY
CANC (Tema Oncology ETF) and ARMY (Tema International Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CANC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Tema, while ARMY is a Aerospace & Defense fund actively managed by Tema. Both are actively managed. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CANC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for ARMY.
Performance
CANC vs. ARMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CANC
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- 6M
- 13.52%
- YTD
- 16.92%
- 1Y
- 56.68%
- 3Y*
- 102.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -9.07%
ARMY
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $60.49K | $59.12K | $65.58K | |
| $1.11M | $1.31M | $1.24M |
CANC vs. ARMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CANC Tema Oncology ETF | 15.78% |
ARMY Tema International Defense ETF | 2.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between CANC and ARMY is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2026 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CANC vs. ARMY — Risk / Return Rank
CANC
ARMY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CANC vs. ARMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Oncology ETF (CANC) and Tema International Defense ETF (ARMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CANC | ARMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.14 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.53 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CANC vs. ARMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CANC drawdown since its inception was -97.53%, which is greater than ARMY's maximum drawdown of -16.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CANC and ARMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CANC | ARMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.53% | -16.37% | -81.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.53% | -6.39% | -45.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.46% | -7.53% | -64.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.45% | — | — |
Volatility
CANC vs. ARMY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CANC | ARMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.78% | 31.33% | -8.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 275.54% | 31.33% | +244.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 275.54% | 31.33% | +244.21% |
CANC vs. ARMY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CANC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMY's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
CANC vs. ARMY - Dividend Comparison
CANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, while ARMY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMY Tema International Defense ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CANC Tema Oncology ETF | 0.05% | 0.06% | 3.00% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CANC and ARMY have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMY is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMY is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CANC.
CANC has the higher dividend yield at 0.05%, compared with 0.00% for ARMY.
CANC is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while ARMY is Aerospace & Defense. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CANC and 0.68% for ARMY.
Find the right allocation for CANC and ARMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer