CAMX vs. KEAT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CAMX (Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF) and KEAT (Keating Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAMX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Cambiar Funds, while KEAT is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Keating. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CAMX returned 13.72% vs 19.10% for KEAT. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CAMX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for KEAT.

Performance

CAMX vs. KEAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) and Keating Active ETF (KEAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAMX achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly higher than KEAT's 5.02% return.

CAMX

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -0.03%
• YTD: 8.45%
• 6M: 8.00%
• 1Y: 13.72%
• 3Y*: 13.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KEAT

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -5.12%
• YTD: 5.02%
• 6M: 4.22%
• 1Y: 19.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAMX vs. KEAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CAMX Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF	8.45%	9.49%	3.23%
KEAT Keating Active ETF	5.02%	22.76%	3.10%

Correlation

The correlation between CAMX and KEAT is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024	0.50

The correlation between CAMX and KEAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CAMX vs. KEAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAMX

CAMX Risk / Return Rank: 28
CAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
CAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
CAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
CAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
CAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

KEAT

KEAT Risk / Return Rank: 51
KEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
KEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
KEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
KEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
KEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAMX vs. KEAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) and Keating Active ETF (KEAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CAMX	KEAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	1.79	-0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	2.42	-0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.32	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.17	2.04	-0.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.82	6.99	-3.17

CAMX vs. KEAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the KEAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAMX and KEAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CAMX vs. KEAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAMX drawdown since its inception was -15.71%, which is greater than KEAT's maximum drawdown of -9.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAMX and KEAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAMX	KEAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.71%	-9.40%	-6.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.79%	-9.40%	-2.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.01%	-9.40%	+7.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.73%	-1.70%	-1.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.60%	2.74%	+0.86%

Volatility

CAMX vs. KEAT - Volatility Comparison

Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to Keating Active ETF (KEAT) at 3.48%. This indicates that CAMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KEAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CAMX	KEAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.29%	3.48%	+0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.92%	8.81%	+2.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.05%	10.73%	+3.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.50%	10.41%	+4.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.50%	10.41%	+4.09%

CAMX vs. KEAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAMX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than KEAT's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

CAMX vs. KEAT - Dividend Comparison

CAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than KEAT's 2.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CAMX Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF	1.67%	1.81%	1.33%	0.55%
KEAT Keating Active ETF	2.34%	2.48%	1.72%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CAMX and KEAT in my portfolio?

CAMX and KEAT have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CAMX or KEAT?

CAMX has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to KEAT (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAMX dropped -15.71% vs KEAT's -9.40%.

Which ETF is better, CAMX or KEAT?

On 1-year performance, KEAT leads with 19.10% vs 13.72% for CAMX. On fees, CAMX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, KEAT has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CAMX or KEAT?

Over the 1-year period, KEAT has performed better with a 19.10% return vs 13.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CAMX or KEAT?

CAMX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for KEAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CAMX or KEAT?

KEAT has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 1.67% for CAMX.

What is the main difference between CAMX and KEAT?

CAMX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while KEAT is Global Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Cambiar Funds and Keating. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CAMX and 0.85% for KEAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KEAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.