PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAMMX vs. TARKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAMMX vs. TARKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambiar SMID Fund (CAMMX) and Tarkio Fund (TARKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAMMX achieves a 18.17% return, which is significantly lower than TARKX's 22.38% return. Over the past 10 years, CAMMX has underperformed TARKX with an annualized return of 10.49%, while TARKX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.83% annualized return.


CAMMX

1D
-0.65%
1M
1.02%
6M
13.82%
YTD
18.17%
1Y
22.64%
3Y*
6.34%
5Y*
4.72%
10Y*
10.49%
ALL TIME*
9.39%

TARKX

1D
3.94%
1M
0.87%
6M
14.37%
YTD
22.38%
1Y
45.72%
3Y*
24.84%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
14.83%
ALL TIME*
13.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CAMMX vs. TARKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAMMX
Cambiar SMID Fund
18.17%0.08%-1.42%12.93%-6.07%23.32%9.60%31.00%-2.68%11.77%
TARKX
Tarkio Fund
22.38%30.18%21.72%26.33%-30.39%24.41%27.00%29.54%-23.30%29.04%

Correlation

The correlation between CAMMX and TARKX is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2011

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between CAMMX and TARKX has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAMMX vs. TARKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CAMMX
CAMMX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
CAMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
CAMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

TARKX
TARKX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TARKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TARKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TARKX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TARKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TARKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CAMMX vs. TARKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambiar SMID Fund (CAMMX) and Tarkio Fund (TARKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAMMXTARKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.26

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

2.58

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.75

8.86

-3.11

CAMMX vs. TARKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAMMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the TARKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAMMX and TARKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAMMX vs. TARKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAMMX drawdown since its inception was -41.94%, roughly equal to the maximum TARKX drawdown of -40.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAMMX and TARKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAMMXTARKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.94%

-40.55%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.49%

-16.99%

+7.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.75%

-36.99%

+15.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.75%

-40.38%

+18.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.94%

-40.55%

-1.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-4.00%

+2.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.91%

-10.30%

+4.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

4.94%

-1.55%

Volatility

CAMMX vs. TARKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cambiar SMID Fund (CAMMX) is 3.88%, while Tarkio Fund (TARKX) has a volatility of 8.19%. This indicates that CAMMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TARKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAMMXTARKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

8.19%

-4.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.08%

22.54%

-11.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.19%

29.27%

-14.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.96%

27.83%

-10.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.68%

26.80%

-8.12%

CAMMX vs. TARKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAMMX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than TARKX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAMMX vs. TARKX - Dividend Comparison

CAMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.24%, more than TARKX's 4.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAMMX
Cambiar SMID Fund
29.24%34.55%6.10%0.70%0.95%11.52%0.61%4.08%6.83%0.39%0.53%0.31%
TARKX
Tarkio Fund
4.50%5.50%1.51%2.98%10.62%1.40%0.50%5.21%3.34%1.70%0.47%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAMMX and TARKX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TARKX has higher volatility (8.19%) compared to CAMMX (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAMMX dropped -41.94% vs TARKX's -40.55%.

TARKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAMMX and TARKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer